Deal Saver - brought to you by the Charlotte Observer

0 comments
  • Print
  • Reprint or License
  • Share Share

Creating a marriage of culture, science

By Tyler Dukes
Correspondent
Contact Us

We value reader comments and suggestions. Contact John Bordsen, SciTech editor.

SciTech is independently reported and edited by the Charlotte Observer and The News & Observer of Raleigh. SciTech's sponsor in the printed newspaper plays no role in the selection of the content.


Science whiz? Sign up for our citizen source network.

You can help journalists by lending your expertise to stories. It is free and easy to join our network.

Jennifer Rohn, 43, a cell biologist at University College London, blogs about the culture of science at Mind the Gap (occamstypewriter.org/mindthegap ). She has authored two novels about scientists and launched LabLit.com to examine science in writing. Follow her on Twitter @jennyrohn. Questions and answers have been edited.

Q. How do you balance the sciences and the humanities?

It's actually quite a good balance, because biology is all about intense, multitasking manual labor - sort of like cooking an eight-course meal to a tight deadline. There is a lot of thinking that goes on in the lab, too, but it's very focused to the tasks at hand. By the time I get home, it can be nice to switch on the computer and just sink into the fictional world I'm creating, to tell stories that don't depend on nature to be successful.

Q. Much of your writing deals with the human stories of scientists - including imperfections. Why do you think that's important?

Science is an imperfect craft practiced by imperfect human beings. Until you understand that, you are never going to understand how science works. But the system, as messy as it is, ultimately self-corrects. Today's headline cancer cure might tank next year, and it will be fellow scientists who will do that debunking. But this means that you can never completely trust something as being "true" until it's stood the test of time.

Q. How does your experience as a scientist compare to what you see depicted in popular culture?

Hollywood is miles ahead of everyone else, and has started to depict scientists more accurately. You can see a lot of normal-looking young people of both sexes now, portrayed as sympathetic characters. It's been a long time since I've seen a wild-haired mad boffin at the movies. It makes science look fun and stimulating.

Q. What effect does the lack of scientist characters in literature have on the public's perception of science and scientists?

Fiction is potent. Novels about scientists, and blockbuster films starring them, have the potential to reach millions who wouldn't be caught dead in a science museum. Fiction is a stealth medium; it needs to be used more.

tyler.dukes@gmail.com

The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.   Read more

Quick Job Search
Salary Databases