Deal Saver - brought to you by the Charlotte Observer

Decision 2012

comments
  • Print
  • Order Reprints
  • Share Share

Decision 2012: 9th District foes spar on ethics

In final debate, Roberts, Pittenger trade jabs over using office for personal gain

By Jim Morrill
jmorrill@charlotteobserver.com

More Information

  • Checking the candidates

    • Roberts claim: She helped create 5,000 jobs.

    Fact: The four-term Mecklenburg County commissioner bases that on the 4,715 jobs created with the help of county incentives, according to the county economic development office.

    •  Pittenger claim: Roberts had a conflict of interest in voting for a 2011 bond issue.

    Fact: Her husband’s firm, McGuireWoods, was chosen by bank underwriters as their counsel for the $164 million bond refunding. Officials say Roberts disclosed that before voting for the bonds. The county’s “Official Statement” about the bonds describes the involvement of Manley Roberts’ law firm. The banks, not the county, contracted with the firm. Manley Roberts was not involved in the bond issue.

    •  Roberts claim: “My opponent has only created jobs for his investors.”

    Fact: Pittenger is a real estate investor. Critics have accused the former state senator of once voting on a measure that increased the value of Union County land he owned, and later sold, by annexing it into Waxhaw. The matter was referred to the Legislative Ethics Committee, which took no action.

    •  Pittenger claim: Mecklenburg County’s tax burden has grown since Roberts was elected in 2004.

    Fact: Since the 2006 budget year, the county budget has grown from $878 million to $1.06 billion. Over the same period the county’s population grew from 791,000 to 966,000. According to county officials, per capita spending fell from $1,309 to $1,102. Jim Morrill


  • More information

    A $3 million campaign

    Republican Robert Pittenger Monday has raised more than $3 million for his congressional campaign, according to a new report filed Monday.

    Most of that – $1.9 million – came as a contribution from Pittenger himself during his contested primary campaign. Through July, no House candidate in the country reached as deeply into his own pocket.

    The new report also shows that while Pittenger loaned his campaign an additional $305,000, he raised nearly $400,000 from individuals and political action committees during the third quarter.

    Democrat Jennifer Roberts’ report was unavailable Monday. But according to preliminary figures released by her campaign, she has raised $446,000. Jim Morrill



In a Monday debate that quickly got personal, Democrat Jennifer Roberts and Republican Robert Pittenger traded accusations and showcased their opposing views on many issues, including the role of government.

The swipes came as they taped the last debate of their 9th District congressional campaign. The debate, sponsored by the League of Women Voters, will air at 11:30 a.m. Sunday on WTVI.

The two are running for the seat of retiring U.S. Rep. Sue Myrick, a Charlotte Republican. The Republican-leaning district includes parts of Mecklenburg, Iredell and Union counties.

Roberts, a Mecklenburg County commissioner, sought to portray her opponent as both self-serving and beholden to special interests.

Taking credit for helping create thousands of jobs through county incentives, for example, she said her opponent “has only created jobs for his investors and cronies.”

Pittenger, a real estate investor, cast Roberts as a big-government liberal who twice raised property taxes and grew the size of county government.

He also accused her of a conflict of interest by voting for a 2011 bond issue when her husband’s law firm served as counsel to the underwriter.

Roberts has said she disclosed Manley Roberts’ connection to the firm, as does the county’s official statement on the bond issue. He was not involved in the bond issue.

“She got very aggressive,” Pittenger said after the debate. “All I did was get the facts out. … She’s a tax-and-spend person.”

Roberts said the state “cannot afford a political insider who’s going to go to Washington … to serve their own self-interests and that of their cronies and business colleagues.

“Voters need to understand that there’s a clear choice and a clear difference.”

And there were clear differences.

Sparring over mass transit

Pittenger, for example, said there’s no role for the federal government in education.

“The best education is what’s done locally,” he said. “And I don’t believe that’s the role of the federal government.”

Roberts said she would refocus the education department away from areas such as testing. But she said a federal role is crucial for rural and high-poverty areas.

On transportation, Roberts repeated her support for mass transit, including light rail.

She made a not-so-veiled swipe at Pittenger, whose partnerships own land along the proposed – and controversial – Garden Parkway in Gaston County.

“Even though I don’t own any land along the (light-rail) corridor, I still support it,” she said. “Clearly my opponent … is not listening to the voters. He’s listening to special interests.”

Pittenger has said he opposes federal funding of light rail.

Transit officials are scheduled to announce Tuesday morning that the federal government has agreed to pay for half of the $1.16 billion light-rail extension to University City.

Pittenger said he supports developing Charlotte Douglas International Airport as an intermodal hub, with rail and road links. He also said his priority is roads.

“We’ve got to expand our roads,” he said. “(Interstate) 77 is … a parking lot. … It’s a matter of what’s the best use of your tax dollars.”

Health care gets a hearing

Another area in which the two clearly differ is health care.

Pittenger would repeal the Affordable Care Act health-reform law. Roberts favors keeping and tweaking it. She pointed to what she called the cost of repeal. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated repeal would add $109 billion to the deficit over 10 years.

“My opponent may think that that matter of money is not very much,” she said, “because he can pull it out of his pocket.”

Pittenger said the Affordable Care Act not only includes 21 new taxes but threatens to come between patients and their doctors.

Brushing off Roberts’ attacks, he sounded confident on the election, which is barely three weeks away.

“We’re in good shape,” he said.

Though Roberts’ campaign commissioned a September poll that showed the race deadlocked, Pittenger is favored.

No Democrat has represented the district since 1952. As redrawn by GOP lawmakers last year, it’s even more Republican.

Republican John McCain won the 9th District in 2008 with 54 percent while narrowly losing the state.

Pittenger, then a candidate for lieutenant governor, carried the district with an even bigger majority, 58 percent.

Morrill: 704-358-5059

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.

Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email local@charlotteobserver.com to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.

  Read more


Quick Job Search
Salary Databases