From a Nov. 15 editorial in the Los Angeles Times:
One of the most valuable pieces of information about a video game is also the simplest: the rating that tells parents what ages the story and graphics are suitable for and why it might not be right for younger users. But as games have moved from computers and consoles to mobile devices, the rating systems have multiplied. Apps for the iPhone and the iPad, Facebook, Android devices, BlackBerrys, Kindles and Windows phones all go through separate ratings processes, each with its own set of labels.
The lack of a common system confuses parents and irritates game publishers, whose titles often span multiple platforms with incompatible ratings. Entertainment Software Association Chairman John Riccitiello, head of game developer Electronic Arts, has called for a single rating system that would work across all platforms. Its the right move.
The video game industry established a voluntary rating system in 1994, creating the Entertainment Software Ratings Board to evaluate and rate games before they were released. Its not a perfect system, but the boards ratings are simple and clear, and they come with important enforcement mechanisms: Consoles can be programmed not to allow games rated for older players, and major retailers have agreed not to sell those games to minors.
But the arrival of new platforms led to so many new downloadable games, the ratings board couldnt keep up with the volume. That left each platform provider such as Apple, Facebook and Google to come up with its own system. The most common approach is to have game providers assign an age-based rating for their products, then let parents set the highest rating their children can download.
Those age-based ratings are not only inconsistent across platforms, they reveal nothing about a games content. Riccitiello is backing the Entertainment Software Associations effort to extend the boards familiar, descriptive ratings to all platforms and to any country that wants to sign on. Instead of evaluating games itself, the ratings board would have developers rate their own games through an interactive process designed to apply the same standards the board uses on packaged video games. The board would then monitor compliance, paying particular attention to the most popular titles and the ones that draw complaints.
This approach wont satisfy people who dont like the industry applying its own ratings to its products. But the associations effort, which is expected to be ready for global use next year, would be a significant improvement over the inconsistencies of the current system. Embracing it would raise a number of tough issues, including what to do about the thousands of games that are already available. Thats all the more reason for those companies to get on board sooner rather than later.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less