Duke Energy chief executive Jim Rogers traces the roots of a state investigation into the Duke-Progress Energy merger to differences in how regulators viewed the $32 billion deal.
In his first interview on the settlement that ended the probe in December, Rogers said the merger was worthwhile despite an 18-month approval process and forced management changes at Duke.
The birthing process of the creation of the largest utility in the country has been quite difficult, he said Wednesday. I think the baby is going to be beautiful.
The N.C. Utilities Commission reacted swiftly when Dukes board elevated former Progress CEO Bill Johnson to lead the combined companies, as planned, then abruptly fired him.
At the heart of that reaction, Rogers said, was regulators perception that, with Johnson in charge, the smaller Progress would have been on equal footing in the combination with the larger Duke.
Sometimes in life you get sideways, and we got sideways with the commission because they saw this as a merger of equals, he said. We saw this as an acquisition. They saw (the investigation) as an opportunity to rebalance what they thought was a merger of equals.
Theres evidence to back up that view.
The commission staff, in recommending the case be settled Dec. 3, wrote that it would restore the balance between Duke and Progress in the merged company as originally represented before Bill Johnsons termination and the departure of other key Progress executives.
Rogers said he personally negotiated the settlement terms with commission Chairman Edward Finley, after Dukes board vetted them, and with the help of current Duke and former Progress director James Hyler. Both he and Finley wanted to resolve the issue, he said.
The settlement specified that Rogers, who will turn 66 in September, leave Duke when his contract expires at the end of 2013, and urged that a search committee find his replacement by midyear. It also ordered Duke to shift three other top executives to new positions.
In testimony before the commission, Rogers and Duke directors said management differences with Johnson, Progress poor financial performance and problems at its nuclear plants led to Johnsons ouster. We basically had a fixer-upper on our hands, Rogers said Wednesday.
But Rogers said Duke didnt try to get out of the deal because it would run the risk of lawsuits and couldnt prove a material adverse event or burdensome regulatory conditions as required.
Despite all that, he said, the merger produced a bigger and stronger Duke.
I think over the next five to 10 years, as good as we are today were going to be even better as a consequence of this, he said. Id do it again. I might not do it exactly the same way, but Id do it again.
Dukes stock rose the day after the settlement, Rogers said, boosting its value to investors by $1 billion.
Rogers credited his 29,000 employees with staying focused despite the turmoil. Dukes stock outperformed an industry index in 2012, its nuclear fleet hit performance milestones and 11 of the 21 analysts who cover the company have recommended that investors buy its stock.
They demonstrated perseverance, resilience and the ability to steadfastly focus on the goals, he said. Last year was a great tribute to the people of this company, to live through that.
Rogers said he has had no further contact with Johnson, who was hired last year to head the Tennessee Valley Authority.
After a quarter-century as an energy CEO, Rogers is writing a book, mulling his legacy and considering options that could include a job in public service as he starts his last year at Duke.
The book, still untitled, will blend Rogers experience with expert interviews on how the energy industry might evolve in coming years and how it will address environmental challenges.
Rogers considers himself a steward of his stockholders money total returns of the three companies hes led since 1988 rank No. 2 among U.S. utilities, according to Dukes calculations.
He touts investments in renewable energy and reductions in power plant emissions, in part as utilities turn to cleaner-burning natural gas. And he credits Duke with embracing coal gasification technology at its new Edwardsport plant in Indiana, which is $1 billion over budget but will sharply reduce emissions.
I always use the expression, the pioneers get the arrows, the settlers get the land, Rogers said. And in some instances Ive been a pioneer.
He will advise Dukes board on hiring a new chief executive and said he continues to raise money for the Democratic National Convention host committee, for which Duke guaranteed a $10 million line of credit. The committee borrowed $7.9 million from the credit line, to be repaid by Feb. 28.
Well see how that goes, but at the end of the day well do our best to get our money back, he said. But if we dont, its just a contribution were making I think for the greater good of our community.
Rogers said he and his wife, Mary Anne, plan to stay in Charlotte after leaving Duke. He said hes open to public service hes been rumored to be a candidate to replace Energy Secretary Steven Chu but said hes also interested in helping bring electricity to Third World countries.
I view that Im in a transition mode. I dont know what my mission will be, he said.
Im very intrigued by the idea of playing a role in bringing electricity. I also think that serving my country might be a good thing to do, it depends on the role.
Ive been working full time since I was 19 years old my great-grandfather lived to be 104 and I think Ill work another 10 or 20 years.
Henderson: 704-358-5051 Twitter: @bhender
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less