From an editorial Friday in the (Raleigh) News & Observer:
Another report from Baker Tilly, the management consulting firm that aided former Gov. Jim Martin in the probe of academic scandal at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, doesnt help the case that the bogus classes in African studies did not constitute an athletics as well as an academic scandal.
Nearly half of the students in 172 phony classes in African studies were athletes. And of the 512 suspect grade changes found during that period, nearly half involved athletes. But Baker Tilly says thats not evidence of an athletic scandal.
So what is it then? An incredible coincidence?
Gov. Martin reached that same finding in his overall report, which was touted when announced but uninspiring when released. It appeared that the scope of the investigation was limited, which has prompted suspicion that the university did not want it to go too deeply.
A report by The News & Observers Dan Kane and J. Andrew Curliss included Baker Tillys explanation for the conclusion that no athletic scandal existed. Raina Rose Tagle, a Baker Tilly partner, said the fact that nonathletes in the classes also got suspect grade changes shows this was purely an academic scandal.
The problem with that logic is that athletes enrolled in the university account for 5 percent of the undergraduate student population but made up 45 percent of the students enrolled in the classes. Tagle says they might have been heavily enrolled in African studies because a large number of athletes were African-American.
Theres some logic there, but then there are the problems, already reported by The News & Observer, with prominent athletes being given extraordinary help with grades far outside the rules, and the presence of an academic advising system for athletes that is alleged to have steered many of them to certain courses. One former adviser transferred out of the academic advising office because of issues like that.
The latest UNC report did not disclose how many football and mens basketball players were in the suspect classes, nor did it say how many of those classes were taken by each athlete compared to nonathletes. And it didnt explain how some freshman football players got into classes normally reserved for upperclassmen.
The UNC Board of Governors, which received the report, may seek and get more information next month.
Of concern to UNC Chapel Hill is the possibility that it could be shown that athletes were given breaks in order to help them stay academically eligible to play sports. If thats found to be the case, the NCAA might open a new investigation of its own.
And the Board of Governors, with its many new appointees, has a chance to demand a tough, thorough, candid and complete explanation of what happened.