From and editorial published in the Washington Post on Monday:
Theres more startling news about the impact of expensive tuition and poor job prospects on higher education. According to the Law School Admission Council, the nations 200 law schools project just 54,000 applications for fall 2013 a decline of nearly half since 2004. Its the clearest indication yet of legal academias busted business model.
For decades, law schools have invested in expensive but underutilized buildings, faculty and administrators, all in the pursuit of excellence as defined by their accrediting body, the American Bar Association. They passed on the costs to students, who paid with borrowed money, confident that law school was a ticket to a high-paying job. Now those jobs are scarce, and the debt-driven law school value proposition is in trouble.
This trend is cause for concern not so much for what it portends in the legal profession but for what it may mean for all colleges and universities. The law-school business model is an exaggerated version of all higher ed. If colleges and universities cant control costs, they could experience the same spiral as law schools. This country may get along with fewer lawyers, but future workforce productivity depends on a vibrant higher-education sector.
Recent data suggest that colleges and universities are barely beginning to face the new realities. On Jan. 16, Moodys Investors Service issued a negative outlook for U.S. higher education. It cited sluggish revenue growth on account of increased tuition sensitivity on the part of students and their families and increased reluctance to incur debt to pay for college as well as state budget cutbacks and the rise of online learning alternatives. College is still a good deal, Moodys notes; graduates of four-year institutions are more likely to find work, and to earn more, than their less educated peers. Student debt remains concentrated in a relatively narrow slice of the population. In a stagnant economy, however, public perceptions of colleges costs and benefits are shifting in a skeptical direction.
The best way for institutions to regain their customers confidence is to hold the line on tuition. To do that they must cut costs. So far, most institutions have tried one-time fixes, not structural reform. Moodys says they must address the entrenched cost drivers of the business model: heavy faculty involvement in governance, inefficient classroom instruction, tenure and lavish student amenities.
U.S. Opinions do not necessarily reflect the views of the Observers editorial board.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less