Deal Saver - brought to you by the Charlotte Observer

comments
  • Print
  • Order Reprints
  • Share Share

N.C. House panel examines lottery

By John Frank
john.frank@newsobserver.com
lottery
-
A bill debated Wednesday by a House judiciary committee is aimed at reeling in advertising for the state-run lottery.

The debate on a bill to neuter the state lottery hinged on one question Wednesday as a House panel considered the measure.

"Do you really think the people of North Carolina are dumb?" state Rep. Mickey Michaux asked the bill sponsor. "What you are trying to do here is regulate people's actions."

Michaux, a Durham Democrat, meant it as a serious question and Republican Paul "Skip" Stam said he considered it a good one. "It's variable," said Stam, a lead sponsor. "Even the smartest person given false information will act in a different way."

The measure -- dubbed "The Honest Lottery Act", or HB156 -- is aimed at limiting the N.C. Education Lottery's advertising and games, which the bill sponsors consider misleading. Stam agreed to remove a provision to change the lottery's name to the N.C. State Lottery because it would cost $6 million to rebrand.

Michaux also raised a question about preventing the lottery from citing the role of an accountant or auditor when advertising or making winning number announcements. "If you want to inform people, you ought to let them know there is somebody standing back there with an honest face," Michaux said.

Stam disagreed about the integrity of a lottery. "It's not on the up and up," he said earlier in the debate. "It's a scam."

The bill is making strange political bedfellows with Stam, the speaker pro tem and former GOP leader, signed on with House Democratic Leader Larry Hall and top Democrat Rep. Rick Glazier. At the hearing, Glazer explained he voted to establish the lottery years ago but has since "developed a concern about gambling in any form." He also lamented that state lawmakers from both parties are using the lottery to supplant state money for education, not supplement the funding.

The bill didn't get a vote in the House Judiciary subcommittee Wednesday to allow more revisions and comment at another meeting.


Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.

Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email local@charlotteobserver.com to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.

  Read more


Quick Job Search
Salary Databases