Save Money in this Sunday's paper

N.C. Opinions: Raleigh

comments

N.C. should open path to same-day surgery centers

From an editorial Monday in the (Raleigh) News & Observer:

The New York Post headline summed up the complex issue with typical barbed brevity: “Mini-clinics give hospitals profit-ectomy.”

Now the same profit-ectomy is being proposed in North Carolina, and hospitals are howling like someone forgot the anesthesia. Our sense is that the process won’t hurt a bit and may even make a lot of wallets feel better.

At issue is House Bill 177. The legislation sponsored by three Republicans would make it easier to open same-day surgery centers for procedures that can be done on an out-patient basis, such as tonsillectomies and cataract surgeries.

As The Charlotte Observer’s Ames Alexander reported last week, the proposed expansion is modeled on 2005 legislation that made it easier for gastroenterologists to perform colonoscopies and endoscopies in their offices. That change appears to have worked well for doctors and patients alike. Doctors serve more patients without the hospital overhead; patients and insurance providers save money.

The centers are growing in number around the country but have lagged in North Carolina mostly because of the state’s stringent standards for receiving a Certificate of Need, essentially a license to open a new medical facility or to purchase expensive medical equipment. HB 177 would exempt diagnostic centers from CON review and make it easier to win approval of same-day surgery centers.

The CON was intended to keep hospitals from building unnecessary facilities and buying expensive equipment they couldn’t fully employ. But hospitals now use the certificate requirements to fend off upstart competitors and protect their local monopolies on certain services.

The need for hospitals to protect that advantage is essentially the N.C. Hospital Association’s argument against HB 177. The association says relaxing CON standards would allow surgeons to open facilities and take away the profitable services that keep hospitals viable.

The association’s objections have merit, but they don’t trump the case for HB 177. The proposed law has provisions to protect vulnerable hospitals in under-served areas, and it protects patients, too.

This is the direction medicine must go in the 21st century. Technology has made many surgeries safer, easier and less invasive. There’s no reason policies should stand in the way of their also becoming less expensive.

And, ultimately, as Alexander also has reported, hospitals sometimes use their control of facilities to gouge insured patients.

After that rich and excessive diet, hospitals can hardly complain now about having to undergo a profit-ectomy.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.

Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email local@charlotteobserver.com to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.

  Read more



Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.

Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email local@charlotteobserver.com to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.

  Read more


Quick Job Search
Salary Databases
Your 2 Cents
Share your opinion with our Partners
Learn More
CharlotteObserver.com