Save Money in this Sunday's paper

comments

State senator proposes 5-year waiting period for ex-felons seeking to vote

By Thomasi McDonald
tmcdonald@newsobserver.com

More Information

  • Where, and when, felons are allowed to vote

    North Carolina is among 19 states that allow people convicted of felonies to have their voting and other citizenship rights restored upon completing their prison sentences, probation or parole and paying any fines, according to ProCon.org, a nonprofit website that researches controversial issues and presents them in a nonpartisan format.

    An additional 17 states restore voting rights to felons after they’ve completed their prison sentences or their parole.

    Twelve states either require waiting periods like the one proposed by Newton or permanently ban convicted felons from voting.

    Two states, Vermont and Maine, allow convicted felons to vote via absentee ballot while serving their prison terms.



RALEIGH People convicted of felonies who have paid their debts to society in North Carolina would no longer automatically get back the right to vote under the Senate’s version of the voter ID bill.

The bill would require people convicted of felony crimes to wait five years upon completing their sentence, probation or parole before they could attempt to re-register to vote. First, though, they would have to get affidavits from two registered voters attesting to their “upstanding moral character” and get the unanimous approval of their local board of elections.

The bill’s primary sponsor, E.S. “Buck” Newton of Wilson, said he considers the measure a compromise.

“The long and short of it is the vast majority of people I have spoken to regarding election laws think convicted felons should not be able to vote at all,” said Newton, a Republican who represents Wilson, Nash and Johnston counties. “I think a person can make a mistake, get their lives together and show themselves to be upstanding citizens. A five-year time frame is a reasonable period to show that.”

Critics say the bill is racially biased and is among a series of initiatives designed to suppress the black vote since President Barack Obama was re-elected.

Of the more than 40,000 people in North Carolina’s prisons in 2011 – 93 percent of whom were men – 57 percent were black, even though African-Americans make up only 22 percent of the state’s population.

“This is essentially voter suppression for African-American males who have been most disproportionately impacted by and entangled in the criminal justice system,” said Dennis Gaddy, director of the Community Success Initiative, a Raleigh-based nonprofit that advocates on behalf of ex-offenders at the General Assembly. N.C. Central University law professor Irv Joyner said the bill is an attempt to disenfranchise people with felony convictions and will have a dramatic impact on minority voting power. Joyner and Gaddy both think the bill is similar to laws passed in North Carolina at the turn of the past century that resulted in no black legislators being elected to the General Assembly until 1969.

Newton says his proposal was not motivated by hopes of suppressing the vote.

“Folks who are criminals should not have the right to vote until they show that they are upstanding citizens,” he said. “My hope would be that the vast majority would have their rights restored, fully.”

Supporters weigh bill’s pros, cons

Newton’s bill, Senate Bill 721, also would require photo identification cards to vote and would revise the state’s early voting and same-day registration laws.

It was sent to a Senate committee on April 3. The House voter ID bill, which does not address voting by convicted felons, was approved by the House Finance Committee 18-10 last week and is expected to be debated by the full House starting Wednesday.

Twelve of Newton’s fellow Republican senators co-sponsored his voting bill. Shirley B. Randleman, a one-term senator from Wilkesboro, said the five-year waiting period for felons would indicate how well the corrections system is succeeding in rehabilitating inmates for the long term.

“I worked in the court system for 34 years,” said Randleman, a retired clerk of superior court. “I know there are high recidivism rates and often additional (criminal) acts that may bring additional felony charges.”

But not all of the co-sponsors agree with the five-year waiting period for felony offenders. Warren Daniel, an attorney and two-term senator from Morganton, said he thinks photo identification for voters is a good idea and that he “wholeheartedly supports shortening early voting,” but that restoration of voting rights for felony offenders “is not a burning issue” for him.

“That’s not an issue that’s driving me to support this bill,” Daniel said.

Gary Bartlett, director of the N.C. State Board of Elections, said the state does not track of the number of former offenders who annually regain their right to vote in the state.

The agency is notified monthly by the state Department of Correction about those convicted of felony offenses who are registered voters so their names can be stricken from voting rolls.

Constitutional questions raised

So far this year, more than 3,100 felony offenders have been removed from the state’s voter rolls, on top of 9,621 last year and 8,167 in 2011.

There were 299 cases of voter fraud involving people wrongfully voting in the 2008 presidential election after they were convicted of felonies, according to the state Board of Elections.

Bartlett said he wonders if Newton’s proposal conflicts with the state’s Constitution.

Newton said the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld other states’ denial of citizenship rights. He said that even after offenders complete a prison sentence and probation, they don’t necessarily deserve their rights.

“It’s not a question of paying a debt to society,” he said. “We’re talking about the restoration of voter rights. That’s a serious civic responsibility.”

McDonald: 919-829-4533
Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.

Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email local@charlotteobserver.com to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.

  Read more



Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.

Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email local@charlotteobserver.com to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.

  Read more


Quick Job Search
Salary Databases
Your 2 Cents
Share your opinion with our Partners
Learn More