They don’t want to say it. They don’t want to whisper it. They certainly don’t want to talk about it. But in figuring how to revise the state’s formulas for future spending on transportation, Gov. Pat McCrory and his secretary at the Department of Transportation, Tony Tata, are going to have to face something that no-tax Republicans try to avoid: To meet the need for roads and renovations and rail transit, North Carolina is going to have to find some additional revenue. Meaning money. Meaning...easy now, GOPers...some kind of tax.
When it comes to transportation, in North Carolina the rubber has met the road.
The News & Observer’s Bruce Sicelofflaid it out after Tata and McCrory discussed a game plan for setting priorities on spending the state’s transportation dollars. What they didn’t discuss was a way to pay for transportation expenses.
Siceloff noted some sobering facts: The state is one of the country’s fastest-growing, with 1.3 million more residents expected by 2023, just 10 years from now; transportation revenue from the feds and the state, however, are going to drop by $1.7 billion in that time. Gas tax collections are dropping, fees associated with owning motor vehicles are flat and the highway use tax on car sales are low.
But the real crunch for McCrory and Tata may be the prospect of having to convince Republicans now running the General Assembly that some sort of additional transportation tax may not just be helpful, but may be a necessity. Without adequate and varied alternatives for transportation, the governor’s much-ballyhooed goal of creating jobs will be stopped in its tracks.
This is a not-uncommon problem for GOP politicians who win elections. Their campaign-speak of lower taxes and belt-tightening runs up against the reality of maintaining government and the services people expect from it.
Other states, yes even some run by Republicans, have had to look at additional transportation fees and taxes.
Absent additional revenue, the governor will be looking at tensions that could well divide the state he needs to bring together. Urban corridors are where growth is liable to be more intense, and those areas will need more in the way of transportation money. That could alienate rural areas that think their own needs are critical. Repairs are an increasing expense, but some new roads are needed. Rail between urban areas is the future, but where will the money come from?
Tata said, that “discussion of revenues” will happen over “over the next year or two.” The troops, General, will have to move faster than that.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less