Largely overlooked amid the wall-to-wall coverage of the Boston terror attacks was some intriguing and potentially important political news. Former President George W. Bush weighed in on speculation regarding his brother former Florida Gov. Jeb Bushs presidential prospects, saying that he hopes his sibling runs for the nations highest office in 2016.
If Bush runs, it is unlikely that he will be the only familiar name on the ballot. It is widely believed that former first lady-turned-Senator-turned-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will also run. This means that regardless of political party, the White House could soon be occupied by a familiar name and family.
But are political dynasties actually good for America?
One of the core principles that are supposed to distinguish America from monarchy-ruled countries in Europe is that in America, political power is supposed to be earned, not inherited. Yet from our countrys earliest days, political power has been concentrated among already powerful families. The earliest example is the Adams family. John Adams was the countrys first vice president and second president, while his son John Quincy Adams served as the countrys sixth president.
It would be more than a century before this feat would be repeated, with George H.W. Bush serving as the nations 41st president and his son George W. Bush becoming the 43rd. But throughout history, there have been countless sons, daughters and spouses succeeding their mothers, fathers, uncles and aunts into state legislatures and Congress.
Within the Bush family, Prescott Bush, the first President Bushs father, served in the U.S. Senate. Barbara Bush, the former first lady and mother of the second President Bush, is descended from Franklin Pierce, the 14th U.S. president . In addition to Jeb Bushs possible presidential run, his son George Pierce Bush is running for office in Texas.
The most comparable Democratic counterpart to the Bushes is the Kennedy family. The Kennedys count one president (John F. Kennedy), one attorney general (Robert F. Kennedy), three senators (John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy and Edward Kennedy) and three congressmen (Patrick Kennedy, Joseph Kennedy II and his son Joseph Kennedy III), one lieutenant governor (Kathleen Kennedy Townsend) and two ambassadors including family patriarch Joseph Kennedy.According to reports, the family could soon count another. It is rumored that the Obama administration is considering nominating John F. Kennedys daughter, Caroline Kennedy, ambassador to Japan.
A few of Americas other notable political dynasties include the Landrieus of Louisiana (with two New Orleans mayors and one senator), the Pryors of Arkansas (two senators), the Meeks of Florida (two members of Congress) the Gores (two senators, one who became vice president) and the Udall family, which includes multiple members of the Senate, the Houseand various other offices spanning both major political parties.
And lets not forget the Romneys. 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney is the son of former Michigan Gov. George Romney and Senate candidate Lenore Romney.
Although children of privilege cannot help the circumstances into which they are born any more than those of us who are not born into privilege can and therefore deserve to be considered on their merits just like the rest of us, the fact that they are so overrepresented in government means that they probably arent being judged on their merits like the rest of us. But thats not the greatest travesty.
The fact that our political system is dominated by so many people of privilege is cause for concern because it means that even if our elected officials represent racial and gender diversity, they still arent really that diverse. Ultimately, people of privilege and power have plenty in common certainly more in common with one another than with those of us who dont enjoy much privilege or power.
Both Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush have the academic and political smarts to be effective candidates and competent presidents. What is debatable is whether or not both of them possess something that Barack Obama did when he ran for office: the knowledge of what its like to make career decisions based on whether or not you will be able to pay off your student-loan debt someday, or knowing what its like to lose a parent because of substandard health care, and because your family couldnt afford anything better.
This kind of firsthand knowledge of what life is like for average Americans is something you cant pick up by reading a briefing book or just talking to voters on the campaign trail. Does this mean that Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton shouldnt be allowed to run? No. But it might be nice if they publicly acknowledged that no one should consider voting for their children until those children demonstrated some actual experience and qualifications, too, experience that extends beyond simply having the right last name.
Keli Goff is The Roots political correspondent.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less