From an editorial in Sundays Washington Post:
When they take the Scout Oath, boys pledge to be morally straight. But as they figure out how to remove their ban on openly gay Scouts, the Boy Scouts leaders have become morally incoherent.
Last week the organizations executive committee proposed changing the membership rules to allow openly gay youth but not openly gay adults who would be Scout leaders to participate. The committee is in a tough spot, attempting to find a compromise on a polarizing issue without rending a community that does a great deal of good. Some Scouting sponsors maintain a deep religious conviction that homosexuality is immoral; many others, who accept that gay boys dont choose to be gay, are eager to end discrimination.
But this is a bad way to deal with that challenging reality.
The executive committee considered leaving the question to individual troop sponsors. There was at least an argument for that as a pragmatic intermediate step. Openly gay boys and adults could participate in enlightened troops; those who object would still have troops that continued to discriminate available. The proposal was silent on the evils of discrimination.
The latest plan is worse than silent. Excluding openly gay adults suggests that they are dangerous, potential child abusers or brainwashers of such threat that they should be denied a place in Scouting.
The logic is perverse: Its OK for gay teens to learn, grow and serve in the fellowship of Scouting without lying about who they are but only until theyre 18, after which they become a menace. If the idea is that the organization does not want to hold openly gay men up as role models, National Reviews Ed Whelan points out that the proposal hardly serves that end. Seventeen-year-old Scouts can serve as senior patrol leaders and troop guides.
If the committee fears that gay Scout leaders will prey on boys, its proposal is ignorant. Predators can be found among gays and among heterosexuals. Any organization of children needs sound policies to guard against abuse. The Boy Scouts boast that their policies to prevent and detect child abuse are among the best in the youth-serving community. That, not discrimination, is the best safeguard.
One explanation for the bizarre proposal is that it corresponds with the results of a survey the organization recently conducted of its members. Boys favored lifting the ban on openly gay scouts; adult Scout leaders did not. Its only a matter of time before the new generation fulfills the Boy Scouts commitment to nondiscrimination. The leaders will look better to history if they dont wait for that new generation to do the right thing.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email email@example.com to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less