A Mecklenburg County jury resumed deliberations Wednesday in a $15 million lawsuit filed against a Charlotte developer by the families of three people killed during a fatal 2009 drag race on N.C. 49.
When they returned to the courthouse, the six men and six women found the same question confronting them: Did Crescent Resources contribute to the deaths by not installing a promised traffic signal where the fatal crash occurred?
In closing arguments Tuesday, Crescent attorney Greg York said that answer is no.
Crescent had agreed to install the light in return for permission to build the massive Palisades development near the South Carolina line, York said. But development in the Palisades had stalled, and he said two Crescent traffic studies, the latest in 2008-09, showed that the light was not needed.
York said the fatal crash was not caused by the lack of a signal but by the outrageous behavior of two very irresponsible people.
On April 4, 2009, Tyler Stasko and Carlene Atkinson started racing at the Shopton Road light on N.C. 49.
A little more than a minute later, at the Riverpointe/Palisades intersection, Staskos Mitsubishi Eclipse rammed the car carrying Cindy Furr and her 2-year-old daughter Mackie.
Both died. So did Hunter Holt, a 13-year-old passenger in Staskos car. Both drivers are serving prison terms.
In their suit, the families say the traffic light might have kept the accident from happening. Not only might Stasko have slowed, their attorneys told the jury, but Furr would not have entered the intersection where the crash occurred.
Crescent, they said, ignored state and county requests to install the light. For years, residents had complained that the intersection had grown more dangerous, particularly since Crescent had significantly widened the main entrance into the Palisades.
Before a light was installed, according to testimony during a trial of more than two weeks, the Palisades entrance was the only intersection in the state with double turn lanes and no signal.
Clearly, Crescent should have fulfilled the promise it made in 2001, said Fred DeVore, the attorney for Furrs husband, Steve Price.
They gambled. They said, We bet we can put this off long enough until we can get someone else to pay. They gambled with the lives of the Holt family and the Price family.
York, though, said the plaintiffs cant prove that the light would have made any difference. Stasko was driving more than 85 mph when his car struck Furrs, and there was no sign he tried to stop.
The Crescent lawyer went on to argue that the families cannot collect damages because both Furr and Hunter Holt contributed to their own deaths Furr by entering the intersection with traffic approaching, Hunter by not asking the 23-year-old Stasko to slow down or let him out of the car.
Attorney Amanda Mingo, speaking for the Holt family, said Crescents inaction threatened lives.
Safety? They threw it out the window, and theyre asking you to do the same thing, she told the jury.
When people ask you why you gave these families so much money, you look them in the eyes and tell them, Because Crescent willfully endangered the public, and they didnt do the one single thing to prevent that.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email email@example.com to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less