Some houses sell even before they formally hit the market – through a controversial technique known as “pocket listings.”
What’s a pocket listing? Essentially it’s a private, “off-market” listing, often of short duration. Instead of putting the house on the local multiple listing service – which exposes it to a vast number of shoppers and agents via real estate websites – agents restrict access to information about the house to their own buyer clients or colleagues in the same brokerage, hoping for a quick, full-price sale.
Pocket listings are surging, experts say, because of historically low inventories of homes for sale in major metropolitan areas, along with strong buyer demand and low mortgage rates. This combination has made control of upcoming new listings a powerful asset for agents in very competitive sellers’ markets.
If agents can sell their off-market listing to a buyer-client they bring in on their own, they can collect both sides of the commission rather than splitting it with another agent. If they can sell it through colleagues in their own firm – even at a slight discount to regular commission rates – the full commission remains inside the brokerage.
Brokers in some highly competitive markets say pocket listings are becoming a significant factor in the business. Bill Podley, broker-owner of Podley Properties, a Pasadena, Calif.-based firm that specializes in middle- and high-end communities, says he has heard estimates that as high as one-third of luxury and upper-cost homes selling in northeast Los Angeles County now involve pocket listings. David Howell, executive vice president of McEnearney Associates Inc., a large brokerage in the Washington, D.C., area, says he heard a recent estimate that such listings may now run as high as 20 percent nationally. Glenn Kelman, CEO of Redfin, an online real estate firm, said “we are seeing more pocket listings across the U.S. In Boston and Los Angeles, we also see listing agents refuse to allow any showings of the home until the weekend open house.”
Real estate executives such as Podley, Howell and Kelman are critical of pocket listings. They argue that by restricting access to information about homes to relatively small numbers of potential buyers, agents are not fulfilling their core duties to their seller clients and not obtaining the highest possible prices. Podley cites the example of a house he recently sold. Because it was put on the multiple listing service, it drew 300 visitors and 50 offers within five days, and it sold for more than 40 percent above the asking price.
“It is highly unlikely,” he said, “that the seller would have achieved that kind of price had the home been exposed to a limited number of buyers” through a pocket listing.
Some agents, however, argue that there is a good case for keeping things private: Sellers may not want hundreds of strangers tramping through their homes. Others want to get the transaction done quickly at an agreeable price – not a bonanza – and don’t see the need for Internet exposure. Others argue that large brokerages prominent in the upper brackets of their local markets have agents who know hundreds of potentially interested buyers.
Tom Heatherman of Michael Saunders & Co., a Sarasota, Fla., brokerage, says his firm conducts weekly “caravans” for its agents to view homes not yet on the multiple listing service but scheduled for listing by the company later in the week.
Bottom line: If you are thinking about selling, be aware that pocket listings restrict the audience for your property, and possibly your maximum price. If that’s fine with you, and you understand the potential conflicts of interest when brokerages represent both seller and buyer, go for it.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email email@example.com to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less