From an editorial Tuesday in the Los Angeles Times:
The trial of George Zimmerman, which opened with jury selection Monday, will address the legal charges against the former neighborhood watchman in the death of Trayvon Martin. But long after the jury reaches its verdict, what happened in Sanford, Fla., on the evening of Feb. 26, 2012, will continue to be litigated in living rooms, barrooms and Internet chat rooms. That is partly because the evidence is ambiguous and only one of the two men who clashed that night is still alive, but it also reflects the fact that so many Americans have invested themselves emotionally in one of two competing narratives about what occurred.
If Zimmerman is acquitted, some will probably continue to believe that the 17-year-old Martin was the innocent victim of an unprovoked and racially motivated attack. If the defendant is convicted of second-degree murder or of manslaughter, some will keep insisting that he acted in self-defense.
Still, most Americans will be willing to accept the outcome of the trial if it is perceived as fair not only to Zimmerman, but also to the memory of Martin. So far the Florida judicial system seems to be striking the proper balance, protecting the rights of the accused without allowing his lawyers to turn the proceedings into a game of blame the victim.
Seminole County Circuit Judge Debra S. Nelson denied a request by Zimmermans lawyer that he be allowed to refer in his opening statement to Martins use of marijuana, his history of fighting or his suspension from high school. But she left open the possibility that some character evidence might be admissible later in the trial. For example, if the prosecution were to argue that Martin was a habitually reserved and retiring personality, the defense might at that point be able to use some of the currently prohibited information to contradict that assertion. But the judge should be vigilant about allowing Zimmermans attorney to shift the focus to Martins personal failings.
The death of Martin was a tragedy, and the initial hesitation of authorities to pursue the case unpardonable. But whether Zimmerman is guilty as charged is a question that must be answered on the basis of the evidence about what occurred that night, not on irrelevant characteristics of either the defendant or the deceased.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less