From an editorial published in the Washington Post on Thursday:
Ever since former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden dropped a slew of classified documents into the publics view, the country has reengaged in a vigorous debate about some but not all of the authorities the U.S. government claims to eavesdrop on electronic communications. But there is at least one loophole written into law that makes Americans vulnerable to unnecessary intrusions, is much more unsettling than a lot of the Snowden material and isnt getting much attention.
Though the programs that Snowden detailed were secret, at least a court must scrutinize them. A section of law that hasnt come up for discussion in the past few weeks, on the other hand, is arguably less protective, giving law enforcement at all levels relatively unfettered access to stored e-mail, documents in the cloud and other personal material.
The reason is that law, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, is old, and technology has far surpassed the vision of the lawmakers who wrote and passed it in 1986. Almost no one used e-mail then, the online cloud didnt really exist, and storing personal information for long periods of time with a third party such as Google didnt seem to make any sense. So, the law says, if users keep e-mail on a third-party server for more than 180 days, theyve abandoned the material and law enforcement can look at it armed merely with a subpoena, not a warrant from a judge.
Now Americans store years worth of e-mail online, compose everything from professional documents to love letters on cloud-based word processors and keep all sorts of other files on remote hard drives owned by communications companies and located far away from their homes. Its not just metadata thats vulnerable here its the full contents of every stored e-mail and every cloud-based document. Journalists, among many others, use these tools, which is why the Newspaper Association of America is part of the Digital Due Process Coalition, a group lobbying to change the law.
For years, Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Judiciary Committee, has been trying to do that. Though his updates would keep multiple exceptions for law enforcement, his reforms would at least require government investigators to obtain a search warrant when they want to obtain e-mail content of any vintage from third-party companies. This would not only meet Americans legitimate expectations of privacy, it would also make moot the legally murky question of whether searches conducted under the old law are constitutional. Unlike some of the tougher issues the country is confronting following the NSA leaks, this one is easy. Congress should act on Leahys bill, and soon.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less