It was a year ago this week that the sickening sound of gunfire rang out at a midnight screening of “The Dark Knight Rises” in Aurora, Colo. The mass shooting reverberated painfully in Hollywood.
Five months later, the horrific massacre of first-graders at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., launched more reflection – about gun control, certainly, but also about entertainment content, particularly violent video games said to be favored by the killer.
And yet, in the year since Aurora, seemingly little has changed in the area of violence in entertainment, save the notable musings of actor Jim Carrey, who tweeted misgivings about his latest film, “Kick-Ass 2,” after Newtown: “Now in all good conscience I cannot support that level of violence,” he wrote.
And some ask: If nothing changes now, will it ever?
“My fear is that we have such a short attention span,” says Chuck Williams, a youth violence expert at Drexel University who’s especially troubled by movies that depict “stylized” violence.
Certainly, screen violence is a complex issue. Studies have not shown clear links with real-world violence; in video games, which have undergone the most scrutiny lately, many researchers say the evidence isn’t there.
There’s also the specter of censorship and infringement on artistic freedom, something that raises hackles in the entertainment industry. And, of course, there’s the issue of gun control. Many in Hollywood say that’s where the focus should be, while the gun lobby has suggested violent images in entertainment and games are more to blame.
“The issue makes a lot of people uncomfortable in Hollywood – they don’t really want to deal with it,” says Janice Min, editor of The Hollywood Reporter trade publication. “We can’t allow this conversation to be ONLY about gun control,” says Williams. “Nothing will happen.”
And yet, tastes may be shifting. An Associated Press-GfK poll in January found that 54 percent of adults would support a policy limiting “the amount and type of gun violence that can be portrayed in video games, in movies or on television.” Other polls at the time found similar misgivings about violent content.
And, says Min, while summer offerings are heavy on violent blockbusters, a number have tanked at the box office, perhaps indicating that the public – especially the female segment, she feels – is feeling alienated from the product.
Video games got extra scrutiny after Newtown, especially the “first-person shooter” type apparently favored by 20-year-old killer Adam Lanza.
Industry executives say the scrutiny is unjustified.
Researchers tend to support him. “Everybody’s focusing on video games, but empirically, it just hasn’t been proven,” says Patrick Markey, a psychology professor at Villanova University who’s studied behavioral effects of video games.
Besides, he says, “it would have been surprising if Lanza hadn’t played those games, because most male adolescents play them.” He says games may marginally increase aggression – but not to the level of violence.
Other research, says psychology professor Sherry Hamby, has suggested possible negative effects of intense consumption of violent content across media platforms.
Industry heads say it’s about parental control. “Games are rated for a reason,” says Vince Zampella, co-creator of “Call of Duty: Modern Warfare.”
Each month since Aurora, mature-rated shooting games have been among the top 10 sold, according to industry tracker NPD Group.
Shortly after Newtown, the entertainment presidents of NBC and Fox said they didn’t believe there was any connection between violence their networks depict and real-life tragedies.
“Nothing that is on the air is inappropriate,” said Nina Tassler, entertainment chief for CBS.
Executives go with what’s buzz-worthy – like AMC’s “The Walking Dead,” a gory zombie drama. Fox’s most successful new show, “The Following,” features Kevin Bacon as an investigator chasing a charismatic killer who gouges out his victims’ eyes. There’s also NBC’s “Hannibal,” about serial killer Hannibal Lecter.
And one of the most talked-about TV moments this spring came on HBO’s “Game of Thrones”: a celebration leading to an orgy of stabbings (beginning with a pregnant woman), throat slittings and shootings.
Events like Aurora and Newtown have little impact on the thinking of television executives, says Tim Winter of the Parents Television Council.
“It’s ‘We can get back to business as usual as soon as people stop talking of these things,’ ” he says.
For TV executives, “there’s so much money involved that they look the other way, even if they’re socially conscious, intelligent people,” says Dr. Victor Strasburger, pediatrics professor at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine.
After Aurora, Warner Bros. found itself in the uncomfortable position of having to pull trailers for “Gangster Squad” due to a scene of gunmen shooting up a movie theater. The film was postponed and reshot.
Further scrutiny came with Newtown. In January, former Sen. Chris Dodd, head of the Motion Picture Association of America, met with Vice President Joe Biden and said the industry was “ready to be part of the conversation” on gun violence – while still vehemently opposing content restrictions.
In April, the MPAA and the National Association of Theater Owners announced a new “Check the Box” campaign meant to supplement the ratings system, which has been criticized as soft on violence, by making reasons for a rating slightly more prominent.
“Our industry has a long history of voluntary engagement on this issue,” the MPAA said in a statement for this report, declining an interview request.
Unveiling the “Check the Box” campaign, John Fithian, president of the theater owners group, suggested studios should make fewer R-rated movies.
Just what kind of screen violence is appropriate has been widely debated.
The recent Superman film “Man of Steel” was criticized, for example, for showing the demolition of huge swaths of a city as mere backdrop for a fight. A film like Derek Cianfrance’s “The Place Beyond the Pines,” on the other hand, illustrates the generations-long reverberations of a shooting between a police officer and a bank robber.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less