From an editorial Thursday in the Los Angeles Times:
Have you heard the one about the judge who moonlighted as a comedian? It wasnt a laughing matter for the New Jersey Supreme Court, which ruled recently that Municipal Court Judge Vince Sicari who also appeared in comedy clubs and on television under the name Vince August couldnt judge by day and joke by night. So Sicari is hanging up his robe.
We understand the Supreme Courts concern about the importance of judicial impartiality and the appearance thereof. Still, its depressing the court believes some citizens of South Hackensack, N.J., wouldnt be able to differentiate between a real-life judge and a show-business persona.
No one would mistake Sicari for Antonin Scalia. The Municipal Court on which he served part time receiving a salary of $13,000 deals with parking tickets, bad checks, fish and game violations, and minor criminal offenses. But even the humblest of magistrates is covered appropriately by canons of ethics that require judges to avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety and to maintain high standards of conduct.
The Supreme Court said Sicaris dual career was incompatible with such standards. Yet it acknowledged that the record contains no evidence that Judge Sicari has ever conducted proceedings in his courtroom in any other manner than a professional one.
So what was the problem? The court expressed concern that a litigant, witness or lawyer would mix up the man on the bench with the comic who made self-deprecating jokes about his Italian-American upbringing or the actor who played a waiter who wouldnt serve an interracial family. Sicari enacted the latter role as a regular on What Would You Do?, a reality show in which actors engage in outrageous behavior to provoke a risible reaction from bystanders.
Sicari argued that it was ridiculous for anyone to draw conclusions about his judicial or personal attitudes from the roles he assumed in a work of entertainment. Thats a character Im playing, on TV, he said. If I was in Pirates of the Caribbean,' would you think I was a pirate? The Supreme Court worried, however, that some viewers might change the channel before realizing that what they were watching was a staged encounter.
Its hard to shake the impression that what really bothered the court about Sicaris night job was that it was too tacky a sideline for a jurist, even a lowly one. But a judge who follows the letter of the law in the courtroom shouldnt be removed for trying to make people laugh outside of it.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less