WASHINGTON Its the fastest, cheapest, most effective way to move large numbers of people in an urban area, some transit advocates have come to conclude.
But its not a streetcar or light-rail system: Its a fleet of buses that acts like one.
Bus rapid transit is common in Latin America and Asia, but it hasnt caught on as quickly in the United States. Most transit investment in the U.S. over the past few decades has concentrated on subways, light rail and streetcars.
According to its boosters, bus rapid transit can spur just as much or more economic development generally at a fraction of the cost, although more sophisticated projects can be just as expensive as rail. Real-estate developers and city planners tend to prefer rail systems because of their durability and capacity to move large numbers of people.
A report by the New York-based Institute for Transportation & Development Policy fuels an ongoing debate about the advantages and disadvantages of both modes. The institute released a 159-page report last month that compares 21 North American transit corridors that contain a mix of streetcars, light-rail systems and bus rapid transit.
But the answer may not be as simple as throwing rail under the bus.
In some cities, buses might be the right choice, while in others, rail could be best. Despite the cost advantages that bus supporters claim, high-end systems can be expensive to build and operate, and many Americans still view bus service as inferior.
Perception is reality, said Chris Leinberger, a real estate developer, author and urban planning scholar. Weve got to change that perception.
Transportation policy experts and city planners have come to embrace bus rapid transit. An additional tool in the transit toolbox, said Deron Lovaas, the director of federal transportation policy at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental policy group.
But the more you improve it, he said, the more the cost advantage disappears.
Bus rapid transit isnt an ordinary city bus. It incorporates many elements of light rail: a dedicated roadway thats separated from regular traffic, frequent service, fewer stops, elevated station platforms with better lighting and shelters, and payment collection at the station rather than on the bus.
When you build something higher quality, you provide more transportation benefit, said Annie Weinstock, the director of the U.S. and Africa for the Institute for Transportation & Development Policy and one of the authors of the groups recent transit report.
Weinstock said rapid bus systems could deliver more bang for the transit buck at a time when federal, state and local governments have less funding. But she acknowledged that many rail-based transit systems have been successful at stimulating local economies.
The report cites the Lynx Blue Line in Charlotte, a 9.6-mile light-rail corridor that opened in 2007 and has generated more than $800 million in transit-oriented development.
Both have potential to stimulate development, she said.
Charlotte and other cities, such as Sacramento, Calif., plan to expand their light-rail systems. Kansas City, Mo., Sacramento and Charlotte also have streetcar systems on the drawing board. Additionally, Charlotte, Kansas City and Fresno, Calif., have some variation of bus rapid transit.
Bus plans for Independence
In Charlotte, the Metropolitan Transit Commission in 2006 endorsed having bus rapid transit in the median of Independence Boulevard rather than light rail. Former CATS chief executive Ron Tober believed that U.S. 74 wasn't conducive to the kind of development that has occurred along South Boulevard and the Lynx Blue Line.
The MTC, however, said it would re-examine the issue at a later date.
Recently, the Urban Land Institute released a study for the Independence Boulevard corridor. It too recommended bus rapid transit, but it said the city should consider a streetcar along Monroe Road, in addition to the streetcar planned for Central Avenue.
There is no timetable for any of the projects to be built, however. CATS also doesn't have enough money to build bus rapid transit, light rail or a Monroe Road streetcar.
Observer staff writer Steve Harrison contributed.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less