Save Money in this Sunday's paper

Nation’s Housing

comments

Will buyers get caught in a squeeze play?

By Kenneth Harney
Kenneth Harney
Kenneth Harney, who lives in Washington, D.C., writes an award-winning column on housing and real estate.

Federal agencies haven’t been functioning much this month, but six of them are looking at a proposal that could squeeze huge numbers of buyers out of the mortgage market: a mandatory 30 percent down payment for borrowers who seek the best rates and terms.

The regulatory agencies have set an Oct. 30 deadline for public comments on a 505-page proposal that creates new rules for bond financings of loans for homes, autos and other assets.

Among the housing proposals is something known as “QRM-Plus.”

It would require 30 percent down or more for purchasers, tough credit standards and a ban against second liens on properties at closing.

Though the proposal was floated as an alternative to a much less onerous standard preferred by a majority of the regulators, it is being taken seriously by housing, mortgage, civil rights and consumer groups – nearly 50 of whom are part of a coalition opposing it.

The six agencies include the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Two years ago, the same regulators proposed a 20 percent minimum down payment plan for “qualified residential mortgages” (QRMs), a designation for the lowest-risk, highest quality home loans for inclusion in mortgage bonds marketed by Wall Street. Loans that met the key criteria would be exempt from a requirement that bond issuers retain at least minimal monetary risk in the bonds they sell to investors. The 20 percent down idea triggered such a vehement response from the public and Capitol Hill lobbies that the agencies backed off and didn’t return with a revised plan until late this summer.

Though the latest proposal indicates a preference by the agencies for a qualified mortgage standard with no specific down payment minimum, the mere inclusion of the 30 percent alternative raises the possibility.

Besides the 30 percent down payment minimum, the alternative plan would require eligible borrowers to have pristine, nearly fault-free credit histories.

Critics say imposing anything even close to these standards would force the vast majority of homebuyers to pay higher rates and fees or be turned down.

The Mortgage Bankers Association of America, which strongly opposes the 30 percent plan, estimates that only 18 percent of people who purchased homes during 2012 would have been qualified for their mortgages.

David H. Stevens, president and CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association and a member of the coalition opposing the plan, says “we plan to be very clear and very vocal” in fighting its final adoption.

The politics weigh heavily against it, but then again, the same regulators who got trashed by critics when they proposed a 20 percent minimum are back with a 30 percent plan. So you can’t totally rule it out.

kenharney@earthlink.net

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.

Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email local@charlotteobserver.com to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.

  Read more



Quick Job Search
Salary Databases