From an editorial published in Fridays Washington Post:
Bizarre and outrageous as it is, the notion that political appointees at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey engineered a huge traffic jam to get even with a local mayor would not normally dominate national news. What sets apart the multiday backup in September in Fort Lee, N.J., is that those who allegedly plotted it are close to New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, an early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination and, according to a new Quinnipiac University poll, the best-liked possible candidate of any party.
But the scandal that threatens Mr. Christies prospects and forced him to explain himself in a lengthy news conference Thursday is of interest for another reason, too: what the governor represents in U.S. politics. For all of his operatic and imperious ways, Mr. Christie was the leading centrist within a GOP that is listing right. All Americans have an interest in the survival of a moderate wing.
We certainly didnt agree with everything Mr. Christie did during his first term. Still, his record reflects an admirable streak of independence. He appropriately reached out to President Obama after Hurricane Sandy. He eventually signed a tuition bill for illegal immigrants that was a more rational approach toward the dreamers than many others in the GOP back.
Even the governors bully-boy reputation might be explained, up to a point. Politics aint beanbag. But there is a difference between using the levers of power to achieve policy goals and abusing them for petty payback, as Mr. Christies lieutenants apparently did. Limiting access to the George Washington Bridge, on the pretense of doing a traffic study, made children late for school and delayed first-responders. It harmed the people Mr. Christie is sworn to serve.
He made a start toward recompense Thursday by apologizing, firing a deputy chief of staff who, he says, concealed her knowledge of the scheme from him, ousting his top political aide and promising to cooperate with state and federal investigations. In denying any knowledge of the alleged plot, Mr. Christie staked his future on a claim of ignorance that many find implausible and that amounts to a plea that he failed as a supervisor. No evidence contradicts Mr. Christies version; if its a lie, its an unfathomably reckless one.
Still, the investigations need to proceed. If his subordinates didnt act with Mr. Christies knowledge or approval, what did motivate them? If the questions can be answered satisfactorily, Mr. Christie may survive to carry the flag for the center-right. If not, he'll have to make way for someone else.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less