From an editorial Friday in the Washington Post:
Its been nearly a week since Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 disappeared over well, no one is quite sure where. Malaysian officials over the past several days expanded their search area to a mind-boggling 27,000 square miles, on both air and land, spanning both sides of the Malay Peninsula. Even with an international fleet of more than 42 ships and 39 aircraft on the scene, the case of this missing plane is rapidly becoming one of the great mysteries of all time, David Gallo, an experienced hunter of plane wreckage with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, told us.
This was an avoidable mystery. There are eminently feasible ways to keep track of commercial aircraft, and its inexcusable that they are not being used. In fact, they arent operating even in the United States. This countrys air traffic control system still relies largely on decades-old radar networks, which have a variety of limitations. The Malaysia Airlines case shows one problem: Its hard to track aircraft in remote areas, land or sea. A satellite-based tracking system U.S. authorities are installing will help, but it wont be finished until at least 2020. The United States should at least stick to its timeline.
International aviation authorities, meanwhile, should insist on the deployment of aircraft technology that transmits information in an emergency. That could require new beacons to cover remote areas of land and sea and satellite broadcasting technology on planes. This is reasonable: Theres no excuse for lost iPhones to be more findable than downed planes. There would be a cost to the upgrade. But there is a huge cost, financially and psychically, in launching an armada on a highly speculative hunt when a jetliner is suspected of crashing into an ocean.
This isnt a new lesson. In a feat of undersea exploration, Gallo led a team that recovered the black boxes from a downed Air France jet in 2011 two years after the plane had crashed into the Atlantic Ocean on its way from Brazil to France. Now, three years later, the world is again at a loss. Theres simply no reason, given the available technology, that it should be just as possible for an airliner to vanish today over the Pacific as it was for Amelia Earhart nearly 80 years ago.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less