From an editorial Tuesday in the Washington Post:
After any mass shooting, a vocal faction in Congress insists that Americans would be safer if more people carried guns into restricted public places. But now that Fort Hood, Texas, has seen its second rampage in five years, the argument seems stronger when applied to military bases.
Many current and former commanders disagree, including Lt. Gen. Mark Milley, Fort Hood’s chief. These officers are right, and lawmakers should not impose their views on those who run these military bases.
The Defense Department has considered, twice, putting more guns in the hands of on-base personnel: after the 2009 Fort Hood shooting and after last year’s Washington Navy Yard massacre. Both times, the Pentagon declined to change policy, deciding that arming more people on base would pose safety problems and prompt additional, costly weapons training.
The Defense Department’s policy: Base commanders can authorize certain people to carry weapons. If Congress must do something, it should examine whether the Pentagon needs to invest more in well-organized, official on-base security.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less