From an editorial Thursday in Bloomberg News:
Clayton Lockett, a convicted murderer, was supposed to die by lethal injection on Tuesday. Instead he died of a heart attack 43 minutes after receiving the state-administered injection.
Locketts guilt was not in doubt, and the death penalty is popular in Oklahoma. Nevertheless, Locketts case demonstrates how capital punishment is becoming impossible to administer.
The difficulties in Locketts case, and in a similar botched execution in Ohio in January, are the result of prisons experimenting with new lethal drug combinations now that European manufacturers wont (or, since 2011, cant) supply the drugs that worked in the past.
If Americans are uncomfortable with a criminal-justice system that results in a man thrashing on a gurney, straining to lift his head and calling out as not-quite-lethal drugs enter his bloodstream, as Lockett did, they are unlikely to be reassured by the alternative killing methods states are considering: gas chamber, electric chair, hanging.
Those methods, after all, were largely abandoned in the 1980s to make capital punishment more palatable and to avoid violating the Constitutions prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.
Capital punishment, which is practiced by no other advanced nation besides Japan, might be defensible if it deterred crime better than prolonged imprisonment. But there is no convincing evidence that it does.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less