From an editorial in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on Thursday:
The capture and opportunity for interrogation of Benghazi accused assassin Ahmed Abu Khattala, announced by President Barack Obama Tuesday, have gone smoothly so far.
What happened in Libya, the night of Sept. 11, 2012, which included the deaths of U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three of his colleagues, have been engulfed in the fog of Washington politics and a strange war that continues in that country.
A suspected architect of the fatal attack was Abu Khattala. American security officials have been determined ever since to bring the attackers to justice.
There is room for complaint that it has taken so long – nearly two years – but the capture of Khattala was carried out by U.S. special forces with no loss of life by Americans or Libyans.
The government’s intent is to try him in civilian court, appropriately, rather than cart him off to the U.S. Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and add him to the 149 prisoners who have been held there for years without trial.
Beyond ascertaining Khattala’s role and obtaining justice, the United States could learn from his interrogation information that might offer clarity on what occurred that fatal night. Was the attack planned in advance? Was it a spontaneous response to the U.S.-made, anti-Muslim film making the rounds of the Islamic world? Was the assault a result of the attackers’ awareness of the Americans’ inadequate protection?
“Benghazi” – now an issue in American politics – would definitely benefit from the application of a solid coat of facts. Khattala may be able to offer them.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email firstname.lastname@example.org to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer. Read moreRead less
The Charlotte region is vast and diverse. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all. The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day, but we ask that you keep the discourse civil.
- Do not use profanity or obscenities. And don't try to camouflage profanity with asterisks, abbreviations or other symbols or foreign phrases.
- Do not use threatening language. Talk of violence won't be tolerated.
- No racial, gender or sexual-orientation name-calling.
- Do not attack other commenters for their views. Do not libel or defame anyone or violate their privacy.
- Keep your comments succinct and stay on topic. Comments that bear no relation to the story may be deleted.
- Do not add images to your comments.
- Do not report comments as abusive simply because you disagree with them. Report them only if they violate these guidelines.
- Do not post spam or advertising of any kind.
- Do not post a comment using all capital letters.
We do not monitor each and every posting, but we reserve the right to block or delete comments that violate these rules.
You can help: Notify us of violations by hitting the "Report Abuse" link. Users who continue posting comments that violate these guidelines may, at our discretion, be blocked from submitting future comments as well.
And finally, as Mark Twain said: "Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest."
Enjoy the discussion.