Save Money in this Sunday's paper

comments

Did the Black Death have a silver lining?

By John Bordsen
jbordsen@charlotteobserver.com
  • http://media.charlotteobserver.com/smedia/2014/06/17/15/10/XuSfz.Em.138.jpeg|368
    - CORBIS IMAGES
    This 1512 woodcut shows a doctor and his assistants tending to a victim of bubonic plague, which killed millions in Europe. Bioanthropologist Sharon DeWitte has been studying whether an individual’s age, sex or health made him or her more liable to contract the Black Death.
  • http://media.charlotteobserver.com/smedia/2014/06/17/15/10/1iVN4N.Em.138.jpeg|316
    - SHARON DeWITTE
    Sharon DeWitte an archaeology professor at the University of South Carolina: Behind her at the Museum of London are boxes of bones of victims of Black Death.
  • http://media.charlotteobserver.com/smedia/2014/06/17/15/10/1kTOY1.Em.138.jpeg|237
    - Sharon DeWitte
    A skull from East Smithfield Cemetery, of a person buried during Black Death: It shows porotic hyperostosis – porous bone tissue linked to malnutrition

More Information

  • 2 personal questions for Sharon DeWitte

    Does your research involve personal danger? “These bones are so old that there’s no risk. I collaborated with experts who study ancient DNA. Two years ago, I was a co-author on a paper in Nature about the first complete genome of Yersinia pestis, the pathogen that caused the Black Death. Scientists were only able to get a very short DNA sequence of it from those who died during the Black Death. It was degraded – chopped up into tiny pieces. Because it wasn’t preserved very well, there’s no way it could cause anyone any harm today.

    “I’ve been handling these bones for more than 10 years. I’m your test case. Nothing has happened.”

     

    What reaction do you get when you tell folks, “I’m researching Black Death”? “What I study is so fascinating to everybody. The immediate reaction is, ‘That’s so cool!’ They don’t think it’s macabre or weird, partly because it is a topic people are already interested in.”


  • Read the report

    Sharon DeWitte’s study was published in May in the journal PLOS ONE: http://bit.ly/1potx56.


Sharon DeWitte, 38, is a bioarchaeology professor at the University of South Carolina who commutes from Winston-Salem, where her husband, Eric Jones, is an archaeologist at Wake Forest.

Where does she spend her summers? In the storage room of a London museum, examining bones of people who died in the mid-1350s of bubonic plague. It was a terrifying disease that swept across Europe, killing entire villages and reducing some cities’ population by half.

It struck quickly. People who awoke feeling well could, by noon, find their skin erupting with telltale black pustules. Their carcasses would be stacked into burial pits by nightfall.

It was called the Black Death.

Her findings are turning up what could be described as, well, relatively good news.

Q. What are you doing in London?

A. I’ve been coming to the Museum of London every summer since 2007; it has around 20,000 skeletal remains, from Roman times to the 1700s. The apartment I’m staying in is about a 10-minute walk from East Smithfield Cemetery, near the Tower of London. It was one of the few burial sites only used during the Black Death. The cemetery site now has high-rise buildings, but Black Death victims buried there were excavated in the 1980s.

The exhumed individuals are each in a labeled box in a storage facility. I take the bones from a box, lay them on a table to form the skeleton, and examine the bones.

Most people have assumed that because the Black Death killed so many people that it killed indiscriminately. I wanted to determine whether there was any variation of risk: I wanted to see if an individual’s age, sex or health made a difference.

For my original project and dissertation, I looked at almost 1,000 individuals. I’ve looked at 1,000 more for my current project.

Q. What do you look for?

A. Indicators of their estimated ages when they died. If it’s the body of a child, I look at teeth. Did they, for example, have their molars?

For adults, I mostly look at the pelvis. There are two joints that change in pretty regular ways with aging. For adults, I also determine if they were, on average, short. Studies show that people who are short tend to be at higher risk: During their developmental period, if they don’t get enough food or suffer from diseases, they are not as tall as they should have been.

For determining how tall a person was, I use length of bones as an indicator of stature.

I also look at lesions that form on the teeth called enamel hypoplasia – grooves across the surface of a tooth that reflects illness or malnutrition during childhood. Also, I look for shinbones for extra bone growth, which can form from disease or trauma.

Q. What’s the bottom line?

A. The Black Death targeted people who were poor or in poor health. After it passed, there were fewer people, so there was more food and more goods to go around for those who survived. Due to whom the Black Death killed off, or improvements in diet, the result was a population that was at least temporarily healthier than the population before.

Q. If they were buried in mass pits, wouldn’t they all be poor people?

A. There were hundreds at Smithfield buried in mass trenches, but not how most people would picture it. The dead were stacked carefully and buried in a manner as close to a normal Christian burial as possible. Also, some there were buried in individual graves.

There are no records. And there are no grave goods to indicate social status. A typical Christian burial in the medieval times meant wrapping the body in a shroud and not including any worldly goods. Under normal circumstances, for a wealthy person there might have been a plaque to say who the deceased was. But that wasn’t the case during the Black Death because of the speed with which victims had to be buried.

Multiple trenches may have been used at the same time. Trenches may have been used for poor people or – when mortality was at its height, with thousands dying every day – contain a mix of the poor and the not-poor.

Q. Yet Black Death also killed aristocrats.

A. The poor and ailing were not the only ones killed – but they were disproportionately killed. They were a larger proportion of those who died of Black Death.

Q. What exactly was Black Death?

A. It was an epidemic caused by Yersinia pestis, the same pathogen that causes bubonic plague today. Black Death was a really, really terrible outbreak of a disease that goes back to the Plague of Justinian in the 6th century, if not longer. Bubonic plague continues to kill people every year.

Q. So this is still going on in the Third World?

A. Not just in the Third World. It has killed people in the southwest United States, where it tends to persist because the pathogen lives in rodents out there. Bubonic plague doesn’t kill a huge number of humans.

The modern plague is primarily a disease of rodents transmitted by fleas. But it can become pneumatic – carried by air – and be spread from one person to another more easily.

The speed with which Black Death spread across the Old World – from city to city, from home to home – suggests to some it was a person-to-person transmissible form in the lungs. Rats don’t move across the countryside that far and that fast. People have looked for things like rat skeletons in archaeological sites, but found nothing that would offer definitive evidence Black Death was largely spread by rat fleas.

Q. Then or now, it seems like there’s a societal implication: Survival of the fittest.

A. There are records that suggest some who became infected survived. Maybe they were lucky enough not to be lethally exposed to it. Maybe they had better access to food and had better nutritional status. Maybe they had better immune systems.

If you or I were exposed to bubonic plague today, we would be given antibiotics and would be fine. Where people run into problems is when they don’t have access to good medical care – and that would be disproportionately poor people.

The Black Death could have been an episode of natural selection, certainly. If that were case, the assumption is there was some sort of genetic trait that allowed the survivors to live.

These question opens up opportunities for additional work.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.

Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email local@charlotteobserver.com to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.

  Read more



Quick Job Search
Salary Databases
CharlotteObserver.com