From an editorial Wednesday on Bloomberg View:
The Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. just confirmed what most people already knew: The largest banks are far too complex and opaque for their own good, let alone for the good of the broader economy.
This isnt the first time theyve said it. But its the first time theyve sounded so impatient.
Every year, under the Dodd-Frank Act, the banks are supposed to submit living wills in which they describe how they could be dismantled through bankruptcy without causing panic or tanking the economy. Three years in a row, starting in 2012, the banks have submitted documents that fell short of that goal more or less saying that they are fine as they are.
Its no surprise that big banks find the exercise difficult. With thousands of legal entities spread around the world, their operations test human understanding, let alone effective management. The banks scale and interconnectedness explain why governments feel compelled to rescue them when they get into trouble, rather than face the potentially disastrous consequences of standing aside.
If used to the full extent allowed by the Dodd-Frank Act, the living will is a powerful regulatory tool. If banks cant make a convincing case they are no longer too big to fail, regulators can require them to raise more loss-absorbing capital, for instance, or even divide them into smaller, more manageable pieces.
The Fed and the FDIC have given the banks until July 2015 to show significant progress on their living wills. That progress should be for all to see.
The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.
Have a news tip? You can send it to a local news editor; email email@example.com to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Charlotte Observer.Read moreRead less