• Print
  • Reprint or License
  • Share Share

Obama nearing decision on troops

More combat brigades would be sent to Afghanistan next year.

By Jonathan S. Landay, John Walcott and Nancy A. Youssef
McClatchy Newspapers

More Information

  • President Barack Obama is attending a memorial service at Fort Hood on Tuesday and won't get to his planned first stop in Asia next week until Friday, one day later than expected. The White House was working on the rest of the schedule for Obama's 10-day trip to Asia. Associated Press


WASHINGTON President Barack Obama is nearing a decision to send more than 30,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan next year, but he may not announce it until after he consults with key allies and completes a trip to Asia later this month, administration and military officials have told McClatchy Newspapers.

The administration's plan calls for sending three Army brigades from the 101st Airborne Division at Fort Campbell, Ky., and the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum, N.Y., and a Marine brigade, for a total of as many as 23,000 combat and support troops.

Another 7,000 troops would man and support a new division headquarters for the international force's Regional Command South in Kandahar, where the U.S. is due to take command in 2010. Some 4,000 additional U.S. trainers are likely to be sent as well.

The first additional combat brigade probably would arrive in Afghanistan in March, the officials said, with the other three following at roughly three-month intervals. Army brigades number 3,500 to 5,000 soldiers; a Marine brigade has about 8,000 troops.

The plan would fall well short of the 80,000 troops that Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. military commander in Afghanistan, suggested as a "low-risk option" that would offer the best chance to contain the Taliban-led insurgency and stabilize Afghanistan.

It splits the difference between two other McChrystal options: a "high-risk" one that called for 20,000 additional troops and a "medium-risk" one that would add 40,000 to 45,000 troops.

The officials, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to discuss internal administration planning, cautioned that Obama's decision isn't final, and won't be until after administration officials discuss it with the NATO allies at a Nov. 23 meeting of the alliance's North Atlantic Council.

Coalition forces now include 67,000 U.S. troops and 42,000 troops from other countries. The Army's counterinsurgency manual estimates that an all-out counterinsurgency campaign in a country with Afghanistan's population would require about 600,000 troops.

Although the administration privately is holding out little hope of persuading Canada or the Netherlands to abandon their plans to withdraw combat troops, much less getting additional allied troops, it wants to avoid creating the impression - at home and abroad - that the U.S. "is going it alone" in Afghanistan, said one military official.

Administration officials also want time to launch a public relations offensive to convince an increasingly skeptical public and a wary Democratic Congress that the war, in its ninth year and inflicting rising casualties, is one of "necessity," as Obama said earlier this year.

Generating public, congressional and international support for a troop increase will require heavy pressure on Afghan President Hamid Karzai to crack down on endemic corruption and drug trafficking, to surrender more power to provincial and local governments, and to improve public services, the officials said

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.   Read more

Disclaimer