• Print
  • Reprint or License
  • Share Share

Women still scarce on N.C. boards

Female percentage in policy-making posts is 25%, nearly the same as 10 years ago.

By Rob Christensen
rob.christensen @newsobserver .com

More Information

  • The percentage of women in key state boards and commissions:

    BOARD

    TOTAL

    MEMBERS

    1999

    2009

    Social Services

    Commission

    13

    42%

    25%

    State Board

    of Education

    14

    31%

    43%

    State Board

    of Community Colleges

    21

    30%

    33%

    N.C. Utilities

    Commission

    7

    29%

    43%

    Economic Development

    Board

    37

    19%

    16%

    N.C. Board

    of Transportation

    19

    19%

    19%

    UNC Board of Governors

    36

    16%

    25%

    Governor's Crime

    Commission

    44

    15%

    33%

    Environmental

    Management Commission

    19

    12%

    5%

    N.C. Banking Commission

    22

    6%

    20%

    (The group also looked at the Health and Wellness Trust, the state Lottery Commission and the Golden Leaf Foundation Board, which did not exist in 1999.)

    Source: Women's Forum of North Carolina


RALEIGH N.C. women have made little progress over the past decade in gaining positions on boards and commissions that help determine state policy in such areas as roads, universities, banks and utilities, according to a new report released Friday.

A decade ago, the Women's Forum of North Carolina, a nonpartisan group, delivered a report that found the lack of women in policy-making positions in state government "startling and troubling."

A new report by the same group found that the gender imbalance had hardly budged in the past decade, with the female makeup of key boards and commissions moving from 23 percent to 25 percent over the past 10 years. The numbers have declined on some boards.

"My understanding is that numbers have not improved very much overall," said N.C. Supreme Court Justice Robin Hudson, the forum's president. "We want to see if we can figure out why and what can be done about it."

Women have made major gains in elective office in North Carolina during the past decade: Democrat Bev Perdue was elected the state's first woman governor in November and Republican Elizabeth Dole was elected the state's first woman U.S. senator in 2002. Sarah Parker is chief justice of the N.C. Supreme Court and women hold a majority of the statewide executive offices, such as labor commissioner and secretary of state, that are collectively known as the Council of State.

But success at the ballot box has not translated to equal representation on the State Board of Transportation, the Banking Commission, the Social Services Commission, the State Board of Community Colleges, the University of North Carolina Board of Governors and the Employment Security Commission.

If anything, the appointment of women to boards has become even more anemic recently. Of the 51 appointments made to key boards and commissions from July 1, 2008, to June 30, 2009, only seven were women, according to the Women's Forum.

"Unless the governor and the General Assembly leadership appoint significantly more women in the coming months than they have in the past fiscal year, women's representation may decrease below its 1999 levels," said Melissa Reed, chairwoman of the task force that has studied the issue.

Seats on most of the boards are unpaid voluntary positions, while a few are full-time, paid positions.

The organization has begun taking steps to address the issue. Hudson and other forum leaders have met with the governor's office and plan to meet with the staff of House Speaker Joe Hackney and Senate leader Marc Basnight, the three main offices that appoint people to state boards and commissions.

The N.C. Center for Women in Public Service this fall launched a program, called Women on Board, to recruit more women to serve on boards and commissions.

A number of reasons are cited for the underrepresentation of women on state boards.

David McLennan, a political science professor at Peace College, said women are less likely to offer themselves to serve because they are more likely to question their credentials, while men are more likely to see an appointment as an opportunity for on-the-job training. Because men have traditionally dominated such boards, women have fewer mentors.

The lack of women on boards may also be a reflection of their traditional lack of political clout.

"A lot of appointments are based on political donations and women have historically not given as much," Reed said. "Women are very busy. They have jobs and managing the home and the family."

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.   Read more

Disclaimer