Mark Endres has 19 years left to pay on his mortgage and the Philadelphia barber is not expecting anyone to cut him any slack. So what's all this talk about the government writing a $700 billion check to Wall Street?
Plans for a massive federal bailout may come with calls for reforming the nation's big investment banks, but “the same people are still in charge,” the 51-year-old Endres said Tuesday, as he snipped at the hair of a patron. “They are still sitting back, sipping their lattes, driving their Jaguars.”
Americans don't like much of what they're hearing about a $700 billion proposal to bail out listing financial institutions, especially the possibility that it could reward the very investment firms that got us into this mess in the first place.
But in the end, most people interviewed across the nation by The Associated Press agreed something has to be done, even if it turns out to be a bitter medicine for taxpayers to swallow.
Never miss a local story.
“My resentment is toward the fat cats on Wall Street who are probably going to ride off in the sunset with millions in their saddlebags,” said Margaret Tate, a 52-year-old copywriter, interviewed during a lunch break in downtown Atlanta. “I have a feeling that a lot of those people aren't going to come out of this hurting the way the average American will.”
Nearly two-thirds of the public thinks the government bailout plan is the right thing to do, according to a Pew Research Center for the People and the Press survey released Tuesday. About 30 percent said it was the wrong thing to do.
The telephone survey of 1,003 adults was conducted Sept. 19-22 and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
The nation's financial crisis and its roots in securities backed by subprime loans are not easy to understand. But after hearing about those problems for more than a year and a half, many people have had time to think the situation over.
“I don't like it. I don't think anybody likes it,” said Jeff Mays, of Westerville, Ohio, a suburb of Columbus, interviewed outside a supermarket. “I can agree with it from a practical standpoint, but ideologically, I don't like the government messing in the markets.”
Bob Heglin, a suburban Cincinnati homeowner, said he stays current on his mortgage and isn't thrilled about paying for others' irresponsibility. But he sees federal intervention as a necessary step to stabilize the economy and prevent more damage.
“I don't believe in rewarding bad behavior, but the other side of it is the people that the bad behavior will affect,” said Heglin, a 50-year-old who has worked in the real estate and title industries for more than two decades. He said he wants accountability for Wall Street executives and delinquent mortgage holders, and tighter rules for the lending industry.
“I hope it's not really a bailout,” he said. “I hope it's a corrective measure to stop the bleeding and then to work toward mending or healing the crack.”
There was wide agreement Tuesday that Washington should try to find a way to help the economy without doling out money to Wall Street.
“I understand the ripple effect and that something has to be done,” said Brian Piper in Doral, Fla. “I just wish there was better regulatory practices by the lenders at the time.”