In the dark hours of the recession, it was one of the few economic bright spots.
Week in, week out, the health care sector was adding jobs – at a time when construction, manufacturing and retail hiring were mired in quicksand.
Now, health care is lagging. Health care hiring continues, but it’s rising this year at a stubbornly slow annual rate of 1.4 percent, hit by a sluggish economic recovery, mandatory cuts in government spending and streamlining required by the Affordable Care Act.
That’s down from 1.6 percent in 2013, and 1.8 percent for 2012 and 2011. From 2004 to 2008, the rate of growth in hiring exceeded 2 percent, peaking in 2008, the year the financial crisis began, at 2.7 percent.
“Throughout the recession and recovery, non-health care jobs were slowly climbing back, but health care was pretty steady,” said Ani Turner, the deputy director of the Altarum Institute’s Center for Sustainable Health Spending, a nonpartisan research center that studies health care costs.
Some analysts say it’s partly a side effect of the Affordable Care Act, dubbed “Obamacare,” which aims to penalize inefficiency and waste. It also intends to slow rising health care costs, which were accounting for a greater share of the nation’s economy every year.
“It can’t continue to grow to 18 percent, 19 percent or 21 percent” of the economy, said Mark Zandi, the chief economist for Moody’s Analytics. “The side effect of that is slower growth in health care employment.”
Over a longer horizon, the retirement of baby boomers will increase the demand for medical services. The Labor Department projects that five of the six occupations with the largest rates of growth in employment over the next decade will be in health care. Personal care and home health aides top the list, each projected to grow by nearly 50 percent over the decade.
But for now, the health care sector is readjusting.
Politicians from both parties have a hand in the slowdown in hiring, which economists view as necessary. Budget-cutting Republicans forced a 2 percent reduction on certain payments to providers under Medicare, the government health care program for people over 65. What happens in Medicare ripples across the entire health care sector.
And Democrats passed the Affordable Care Act as a way to expand health insurance coverage, paid for by streamlining what and how the government spends on health care. Since 2011, the rate of growth in health care prices has slowed.
“If you are going to constrain spending growth, and if you are going to slow the growth of health care as a percentage of the economy . . . then eventually that’s going to translate its way into jobs,” Turner said.
That’s not something the White House advertises. In the 2014 Economic Report of the President, the Obama administration devotes an entire chapter of the annual report to the health care law, touting how it’s already helped lower costs across the health care system.
Its only reference to jobs, however, wasn’t about lost health care jobs but rather that lower spending on health care eventually boosts hiring across the economy by “increasing firms’ incentives to hire additional workers.”
Cutting waste out of the health care system, experts said, necessarily results in the disappearance of some jobs in the sector.
“It’s fundamentally tied to bending the cost curve in health care,” said John Challenger, who heads Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a consulting firm that specializes in workplace trends.
The sluggish recovery, marked by minimal wage growth, may also weigh on the demand for expensive medical services.
“People are being cautious about discretionary care and even going in to see the doctor,” Turner said, noting that insurers are also providing incentives to reduce patient stays and treatment in emergency rooms. “All of these things serve to reduce hospital services.”
A detailed look by McClatchy at a decade of hiring data across the health care sector confirms a broad slowdown, albeit with great differences within the sector.