Decision 2008

  • Print
  • Reprint or License
  • Share Share

Who has the best health care remedy?

N.C. is dealing with a growing number of uninsured people, but tight budgets could limit options for next governor.

By Karen Garloch
kgarloch@charlotteobserver.com

More Information

  • Dole, Hagan on final vote drives
  • Voters Guide: Our region's races
  • Children

    Perdue would increase coverage of low-income children by expanding N.C. Health Choice, a federal-state matching program also known as S-CHIP. That plan insures nearly 130,000 children in families that earn up to twice the federal poverty level, or about $42,000 per year.

    Perdue also backs N.C. Kids Care, enacted by the General Assembly in 2007, which would expand coverage for children in families with incomes up to 300 percent of the poverty level, or about $63,000. That would provide nearly universal coverage to children in the state, according to the N.C. Institute of Medicine. (Kids Care is on hold since the matching share from the federal government was not approved.) Perdue would also allow any family to buy insurance through that program, on a sliding scale or for the full premium, to cover children who are uninsured or uninsurable because of existing illness.

    McCrory doesn't mention Health Choice in proposals for health reform outlined on his Web site. Instead, McCrory favors reinstating the child health-care tax credit that began in 1999 but was repealed by the legislature in 2001 when they were seeking cost savings during a budget crisis.

    Low-income parents

    Perdue cites studies that say the only way to achieve universal coverage for children is to make insurance more affordable for their parents. To do that, she would expand Medicaid to cover low-income adults who earn up to 150 percent of the federal poverty level, or about $32,000 per year. Parents would have to prove their children also have coverage. Currently, only low-income pregnant women and new mothers qualify for Medicaid.

    Medicaid expenses are shared – one third paid by the state and two thirds by the federal government.

    McCrory doesn't speak specifically about parents, but he talks about giving people “choice” instead of forcing them into particular insurance programs. He suggests making insurance more affordable through tax credits and elimination of some state-mandated benefits that contribute to higher premiums. (See below)

    He would also reduce costs in the Medicaid program by putting more emphasis on prevention and permitting Medicaid recipients to opt out of the program in favor of less expensive, leaner private policies without so many mandated benefits.

    Mandates

    McCrory wants to eliminate some insurance benefits that are mandated by state law so insurance companies can offer a bare-bones, low-cost benefit plan. He says that would enable more people to buy private insurance.

    N.C. laws and regulations mandate that insurance plans must cover more than 40 benefits, including screening for breast and colorectal cancer and a minimum 48-hour hospital stay for mother and newborn after a vaginal birth. McCrory has not specified which mandates he would eliminate, but aides suggested some policy holders might choose to buy less expensive plans without mandates to cover pastoral counseling or chiropractic care.

    Perdue opposes the elimination of mandates. She says such a reduction would not significantly lower the cost of insurance, and “stripped down” plans would leave more people “under-insured.”

    Tax credits

    McCrory favors giving tax credits to small businesses that provide health insurance to their employees. He has not specified the size of the credits he would support.

    The General Assembly approved a $250-per-employee credit in 2006. Nationally, the average annual premium for a family in an employer-sponsored plan was more than $12,000 in 2007, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

    McCrory also favors permitting small businesses to pool their employees and their risk of illness to make insurance more affordable.

    Perdue also favors tax credits to help employees of small businesses buy employer-sponsored insurance or individual plans. She hasn't specified the size of the credit she supports.

    Libertarian Mike Munger

    Instead of expanding government programs to cover the uninsured, Munger emphasizes cost-cutting to make basic medical care more affordable. “My main concern is not to make sure that everybody has insurance paid for by the state. It's that everybody has affordable high-quality health care. If we had a system where people could pay for their own health care, that would be better.”

    He would renegotiate Medicaid rates so North Carolina doesn't reimburse doctors as much as 30 percent more than Virginia and South Carolina for treating Medicaid patients.

    Munger would like to increase the number of primary care doctors as well as physician assistants and nurse practitioners who can provide primary care at lower cost. He would also expand the authority of PAs and nurse practitioners.

    He supports insurance for unexpected major medical problems, but thinks primary care should be more affordable so consumers can pay for it themselves. “I have auto insurance, but it doesn't pay for oil changes.”

    He supports current programs that provide health insurance for children.

Poll

Are you planning to vote early?

Both major gubernatorial candidates want to make health insurance more affordable and accessible to the 1.5 million uninsured North Carolinians.

But they would tackle the problem in very different ways.

Charlotte Mayor Pat McCrory, the Republican, favors incentives, such as tax credits, to encourage more of the uninsured to buy private insurance.

Lt. Gov. Bev Perdue, the Democrat, would expand government-funded programs, such as Medicaid and the state children's health insurance program, to cover more children and their low-income parents.

Both candidates support tax credits to help small businesses or their employees obtain insurance.

Mike Munger, the Libertarian candidate, supports efforts to reduce the cost of primary care so it would be more affordable, even without insurance. He favors health insurance that covers catastrophic events rather than routine care. And he favors increasing the role of physician assistants and nurse practitioners to make primary care less expensive.

Despite these plans, health care hasn't received as much attention as education and transportation in this election. Given the economic downturn and the slowdown in state tax revenue, the successor to Gov. Mike Easley may not have the money for bold moves to help the uninsured.

“It may take a more phased-in approach,” said Tim Crowley, Perdue's press secretary.

Jack Hawke, general consultant to the McCrory campaign, said any governor will probably have to wait for a second term before keeping promises to spend more on health care.

“We can't even run our health plan for state employees, we're so far in debt,” he said. “That's just a reality check.”

Meanwhile, the number of uninsured in the state has increased by more than 200,000, or 16 percent, in the past five years, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

When it comes to health insurance, children are one of the three groups most likely to be uninsured, said Pam Silberman, president of the N.C. Institute of Medicine.

Others likely to be uninsured are adults who earn about $42,000 or less and people who work in businesses with 25 or fewer employees.

Many states are expanding public health programs to cover more children and poor adults. Small businesses are a particular challenge in a system that relies heavily on employer-provided health insurance. “Everybody's trying to figure out a solution to cover small businesses,” Silberman said. “How much tax credit do you have to give somebody to encourage them to offer health insurance?”

No matter who wins, the new governor will need cooperation from state legislators. Still, a governor's endorsement is important to make anything happen, said N.C. health analyst Adam Searing.

He saw it a decade ago when Easley threw his weight behind the passage of a “patients' rights bill” that allows patients to sue insurance companies that deny necessary medical coverage.

“We finally got somewhere when Gov. Easley came in and made this a priority,” Searing said. “He got all the major players together, the insurance companies and doctors, and made everyone sit down and hash out their differences.

The Associated Press contributed.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

The Charlotte Observer welcomes your comments on news of the day. The more voices engaged in conversation, the better for us all, but do keep it civil. Please refrain from profanity, obscenity, spam, name-calling or attacking others for their views.   Read more

Disclaimer