President Donald Trump and his aides despise and condemn anonymous leaks to reporters.
Except, of course, when they are the ones doing the leaking.
On the “Fox & Friends” program Tuesday on Fox News, the president blamed President Barack Obama (& friends) for recent leaks, which Trump called “really serious because they are very bad in terms of national security.”
He has sicced the Justice Department on inside-government leakers. And his press secretary confiscated his staff’s phones in an emergency internal-leak crackdown.
Digital Access for only $0.99
For the most comprehensive local coverage, subscribe today.
Sounds serious, doesn’t it? But just offstage, quite the contrary.
– Highlights of Tuesday night’s address to Congress were anonymously provided to the conspiracy-mongering Infowars site. (The “story” includes this bizarre disclaimer: “It should be noted this was not a leak, but was given directly to Infowars.”)
– Last weekend, the White House enlisted two unnamed sources to talk to reporters, as part of an effort to knock down a New York Times story about Trump associates’ contact with Russia.
– And White House “background” briefings continue as always, meaning that White House officials are - by design - quoted in news stories as anonymous sources.
The result, especially for the average news consumer, is mind-spinning.
“It’s almost impossible to know whether an unnamed source is someone courageously taking a risk to get information out or a powerful official who is eluding responsibility,” New York University journalism professor Jay Rosen said in an interview. “You could have both of these kinds of unnamed sources in the same news story – maybe in the same paragraph.”
Yes, the Trump media strategy is looking more and more like a hall of mirrors, where real leaks provide what the president blasts as “fake news” – but that same news, vociferously denied, can get a top official fired, as with the former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
In this fun house, a president who, during the campaign, proclaimed “I love WikiLeaks!” because that organization’s leaks were causing political damage to his opponent, now bemoans the dangers of leaks that cause political damage to him.
Journalists “shouldn’t be allowed to use sources unless they use somebody’s name,” Trump said at the Conservative Political Action Conference.
“Two of those officials spoke on the condition of anonymity – a practice President Trump has condemned,” wrote Greg Miller and Adam Entous of The Washington Post in the Russia story mentioned earlier.
Beyond the inconsistency lies a strategy – chaos, distraction and contradiction serve the president well. The keep-them-guessing school of political communication.
“Not caring about the confusion certainly is part of Trump’s political style,” Rosen said.
Of course, not all leaks are created equal.
There are true leaks, like the partial Trump tax return sent anonymously in the U.S. mail to a New York Times reporter during the campaign.
Then there are leaks that are really plants from government sources and, third, an in-between category that Columbia University law professor David Pozen calls “pleaks.” These may emerge in dogged reporting from confidential sources.
It’s hardly new that American presidents both decry leaks and use them.
But in the extremes of behavior on one side and rhetoric on the other, Trump may be setting a new standard for trying to have it both ways.