This week, a federal judge in Winston-Salem begins deciding if these voters should have their voices heard:
▪ Mary, a 50-year-old African-American Democrat, moved back to her home county in eastern North Carolina in 2013. She applied for a driver’s license at the DMV office and said “Yes” when asked if she wanted to register to vote. But when she went to the polls in 2014, her name was not on the voter roll. She had her license but lost her vote.
▪ Luke, a 25-year-old white Republican, moved from Ohio to his new wife’s home in Pitt County. He got his license and registered to vote at the DMV in May 2014, but said he encountered “quite a hassle” at the early voting center that fall because “the paperwork wasn’t filed.” His ballot was rejected.
▪ Roberta, 40, a black Democrat, went to the polling site where she voted in 2012, but the Wilson County elections official said she needed to go to a different poll. Since it was late, the official said she could use a provisional ballot that would count – but it didn’t.
▪ Stephen, 41, a white Unaffiliated artist, lives in his downtown studio in Greensboro and is registered at that address. But officials at the polling place couldn’t find his name and didn’t know where to send him; his provisional ballot didn’t count.
All these voters – and thousands of others – were silenced in 2014 because of an anti-voter law enacted by the General Assembly and Gov. Pat McCrory in 2013. Among other changes, the law eliminates two safety provisions that once rescued voters with problems like those above.
The loss of these two features is at the heart of the case now before U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Schroeder.
One safety feature said a voter with a registration problem (Mary and Luke) could go to an early voting site, show their identification, register or re-register, and vote on the same day.
The second one said a voter in the wrong precinct on Election Day (Roberta and Stephen) could cast a provisional ballot that would count for contests on the voter’s home precinct’s ballot.
These two features helped more than 100,000 voters participate in the 2012 presidential election. Their elimination shut out at least 30,000 voters in 2014, including returning soldiers whose registrations were canceled, voters sent to the wrong polls and citizens with registrations lost at the DMV. They followed the rules, but were silenced by bureaucratic glitches and poorly trained officials.
The loss of safety procedures harms voters of every description, but especially African Americans and youth. That’s not an accident.
Pat McCrory’s campaign strategist Jack Hawke analyzed the GOP’s defeat in 2008 in an essay that concluded, “The [Obama] campaign targeted the most likely straight-ticket voters and made sure they voted early. The number of black and young voters was unprecedented.” It’s easy to see how the partisan goal of winning became intertwined with a strategy to reduce the black and youth vote.
The sweeping 2013 law followed this script perfectly. It cut back early voting and ended straight-ticket voting, same-day registration and voting, out-of-precinct voting and pre-registration for teenagers. In 2012, African Americans and youth age 18 to 25 made up 22 percent and 12 percent of the state’s registered voters, respectively, but were 34 percent and 33 percent of those who used same-day registration.
The truth is our election system is hobbled more by human error than by voter fraud. We need the protections of same-day registration and out-of-precinct voting to save honest citizens from being cheated out of the most basic right in our democratic republic.
In the names of Mary, Luke, Roberta, Stephen and maybe you some day, let’s hope the judge agrees.
Bob Hall is executive director and Isela Gutierrez is associate research director of Democracy North Carolina.