Just who is helping Iran’s hard-liners?

President Obama speaks about the Iran deal at American University in Washington Wednesday.
President Obama speaks about the Iran deal at American University in Washington Wednesday. AP

The latest Quinnipiac poll shows that the American public rejects the president’s Iran deal by more than 2-to-1. This is astonishing. Just weeks ago, a majority supported the deal.

What happened? People learned what’s in it.

And don’t be fooled by polls that present, as fact, the administration’s position in the very question. The Washington Post/ABC poll assures that, for example, “international inspectors would monitor Iran’s facilities, and if Iran is caught breaking the agreement economic sanctions would be imposed again.”

But it is precisely because these claims are so misleading that public opinion is turning.

Inspections? Everyone now knows that “anytime, anywhere” has been changed to “You’ve got 24 days then we’re coming in for a surprise visit.” New York restaurants, observed Jackie Mason, get more intrusive inspections than the Iranian nuclear program.

Snapback sanctions? Everyone knows that once the international sanctions are lifted, they are never coming back. Moreover, consider the illogic of President Obama’s argument. The theme of his American University speech Wednesday was that the only alternative to the deal is war because even severe sanctions will never deter Iranians. But if sanctions don’t work, how can you argue that the Iranians will be deterred from cheating by the threat of sanctions?

And then came news of the secret side agreements between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency. These concern past nuclear activity and inspections of the Parchin military facility where Iran is suspected of having tested nuclear detonation devices.

We don’t know what’s in these side deals. And we will never know, says the administration. It’s “standard practice,” you see, for such IAEA agreements to remain secret.

Well, this treaty is not standard practice. It’s the most important treaty of our time. Yet, Congress is asked to ratify this “historic diplomatic breakthrough” while being denied access to the heart of the inspection regime.

Congress doesn’t know what’s in these side agreements, but Iran does. And this past Monday, Ali Akbar Velayati, a top adviser to the supreme leader, declared that “entry into our military sites is absolutely forbidden.” One secret side deal could even allow Iran to provide its own soil samples from Parchin. Satellite imagery shows Iran bulldozing and sanitizing Parchin as we speak. The verification regime has turned comic.

This tragicomedy is now in the hands of congressional Democrats. It is only because so many Democrats are defecting that Obama gave the AU speech in the first place. And why he tried to turn the argument into a partisan issue. Obama stooped low, accusing the Republican caucus of making “common cause” with the Iranian “hard-liners” who shout “Death to America.”

This is delusional. Does Obama really believe the Death-to-America hard-liners are some kind of KKK fringe? They are the government for God’s sake, from the Revolutionary Guards to the supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei, who for decades have propagated, encouraged and applauded those same “Death to America” chants.

Common cause with the Iranian hard-liners? Who more than Obama? For years, they conduct a rogue nuclear weapons program in defiance of multiple Security Council declarations of its illegality backed by sanctions and embargoes. Obama rewards them with a treaty that legitimates their entire nuclear program, lifts the embargo on conventional weapons and ballistic missiles, and revives an economy described as headed back to “the Stone Age” with an injection of up to $150 billion in unfrozen assets, permission for unlimited selling of oil and full access to the international financial system.

With this agreement, this aggressive, supremely anti-American regime – the chief exporter of terror in the world – is stronger and more entrenched than it has ever been.

Common cause, indeed.

Charles Krauthammer is a columnist for The Washington Post.