Marco Rubio is in an enviable position among mainstream Republican presidential candidates after his strong finish in Iowa. Yet the man is running scared.
He gives the same speech everywhere. The most tightly managed candidate in the race, he shuns risk and appears to live in mortal terror of mentioning the man who dominates the race.
At a town hall event here in central New Hampshire on Wednesday morning, Rubio, as usual, didn’t mention Donald Trump in his speech. But the first questioner, a businesswoman, practically begged the candidate to trash Trump. Rubio demurred.
Rival Chris Christie mocked Rubio on Tuesday as “the boy in the bubble” managed by his “handlers.”
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to The Charlotte Observer
Rubio’s determination not to be taken off of this bland message, or to engage Trump, may give the impression that he is above the fray. But it also can make him look weak and callow.
While other candidates have denounced Trump’s outrages, Rubio and allied groups have spent upward of $30 million on ads so far – none targeting Trump. Rubio has mentioned Trump a couple of times on Twitter. In debates, he has frequently deflected questions about the mogul.
After the December debate, in which Rubio declined a chance to take on Trump’s proposed ban on Muslims entering the country, Fox News asked Rubio why he hadn’t gone after Trump. Rubio said he wasn’t “going to spend a valuable 75 seconds on a debate stage talking about something that’s never going to happen.”
On other occasions, Rubio declined to talk about Trump’s mosque-closing ideas and Trump’s plan for mass deportation of illegal immigrants.
Asked back in September whether he would engage Trump, Rubio replied: “No, I’m ready to talk about who I am and why I’m running.”
Rubio’s strong Iowa finish has brought new attention – and overcapacity crowds – in New Hampshire. But the would-be supporters are greeted by a robot.
The closest Rubio gets to Trump in his stump speech is observing, as he did here in Bow, that “you have a right to be angry, but anger is not a plan. What exactly do you want to do?” Or, as he put it in Laconia a few hours later: “Anger is not a plan. Frustration is not a plan. You have a right to be frustrated. You have a right to be angry. … But what exactly are you going to do about it?”
Voters’ questions, rather than spurring spontaneity, inspire more caution. Asked Wednesday what he’d do about the millions of illegal immigrants who otherwise haven’t broken any law, Rubio said, “We'll figure something out.”
The logic behind Rubio’s candidacy is that, as he put it in Bow: “I give us the best chance to win, and if you don’t believe me, ask a Democrat. They do not want to run against me.”
If he keeps playing the boy in the bubble, they may reconsider.
Dana Milbank writes for the Washington Post.