Last week, Jeb Bush went to Greensboro to stump for Thom Tillis, the state House speaker and GOP candidate for the U.S. Senate. This wasn’t a policy seminar or think tank event, it was a party rally and Bush had one job – to give red meat and boost enthusiasm for Tillis’ campaign.
And he failed. Speaking to an audience of conservative North Carolinians, Bush made the case for immigration reform – “Fixing a system that doesn’t work is a big thing that I think will restore and sustain economic growth for this country” – and voiced his support for Common Core standards, a verboten stance among Republican voters.
That put Tillis in the uncomfortable position of needing to distance himself from his advocate, telling Bush that “You have to make it clear that amnesty shouldn’t be on the table,” and attacking the federal Department of Education as “a bureaucracy of 5,000 people in Washington.”
The New York Times called this “rough,” and it was – the tone-deaf showing of an amateur. Which gets to the problem of Jeb Bush.
Digital Access for only $0.99
For the most comprehensive local coverage, subscribe today.
At every turn, the former Florida governor is hailed as a GOP savior, and for good reason. Even with the baggage of his brother, he brings powerful advantages, from the network of the Bush dynasty and fundraising prowess, to policy chops, potential Latino support, and the enthusiasm of the GOP establishment.
But there’s a huge step between “good on paper” and good, and, judging from his recent performance, it’s hard to say that Bush stands as a genuinely good candidate. Instead, he seems like a cipher – a vessel for the hopes and wishes of wealthy Republican donors, who fear another cycle of embarrassing candidates and lackluster campaigns.
The Tillis affair illustrates his problem. A more talented politician would have tailored his message to his audience. Indeed, Bush should know immigration and Common Core are areas to avoid with a conservative audience. But then, Bush isn’t in the same world as rivals like Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Rand Paul, or even Gov. Chris Christie.
Since leaving office, Bush has lived in the realm of corporate philanthropy, where wealthy executives give huge sums for a variety of unconservative causes, like climate change and Common Core.
It’s possible that Bush could abandon this and shape himself into a warrior for Republican conservatism. But I doubt it. As a major advocate for Common Core (his Foundation for Excellence has collected millions from pro-Common Core groups) and immigration reform, he’s too removed from the world of conservative politics to adapt. And even if he could make the shift, he’d have to stand against more genuine competitors like Sen. Marco Rubio and (potentially) Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker. Put another way, even after Bush flipped on a path to citizenship last year, he was still behind the curve on anti-immigration rhetoric.
Jeb Bush has been out of the political game for almost a decade. If he had the intensity of a Richard Nixon or a Ronald Reagan – who had long respites from national politics before winning the presidency – it would be different. But if there’s a fire that defines a presidential contender, he doesn’t seem to have it.
In that sense, he’s worse off than even Mitt Romney, who continues to crave the presidency; according to the Washington Examiner’s Byron York, he’s floated himself as a player for 2016, the Adlai Stevenson (or William Jennings Bryan) of the 21st century.
Yes, Republican elites want a champion. But in Jeb Bush, they don’t have a fighter, they have a Fred Thompson. For a genuine contender, they’ll have to look elsewhere.