Prince Harry Weighs in on Donald Trump's Ukraine Policy, Risks New Tensions
Prince Harry risked antagonizing U.S. President Donald Trump as he used a visit to Ukraine to call out the United States’ “singular role” in propping up Ukrainian security, saying, “When Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons, America was part of the assurance that Ukraine’s sovereignty and borders would be respected.”
News of the Duke of Sussex’s surprise arrival in Ukraine broke on ITV News and in The Sun early on Thursday as the British royal and Afghanistan War veteran prepared to speak at a security conference in the capital city, Kyiv.
His words came after repeated clashes between Trump and Ukraine’s leadership in the early stages of the U.S. president’s second term, during which he pushed for an end to the war on terms Ukraine did not agree with.
During his address, Harry said: “This is a moment for American leadership-a moment for America to show that it can honor its international treaty obligations-not out of charity, but out of its enduring role in global security and strategic stability.”
Why It Matters
Harry’s comments make it clear that he disagrees with Trump’s analysis of the conflict and believes the U.S. has an obligation to militarily back Ukraine. In particular, his reference to U.S. support coming “not out of charity” contradicts the Trump administration’s assertion that Ukraine has not been grateful enough for the support it has received.
While the U.S. president prepares to host King Charles later this month as part of celebrations to mark the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, the Duke of Sussex’s remarks risk renewing tensions between himself and Trump.
What To Know
Harry, who spoke at the Kyiv Security Conference in Ukraine’s capital, told ITV the purpose of the trip was “to remind people back home and around the world what Ukraine is up against and to support the people and partners doing extraordinary work every hour of every day in incredibly tough conditions.”
In his comments, Harry referenced the historic deal through which Ukraine agreed to surrender Soviet nuclear weapons that had been stored within its borders when the Soviet Union collapsed.
According to the Arms Control Association, Ukraine agreed to give up its nuclear arsenal in return for security guarantees. In 1994, it signed the Budapest Memorandum with the U.S., Russia and the U.K., which “included security assurances against the threat or use of force against Ukraine’s territory or political independence.”
Trump’s policy on Ukraine has been complicated, built around a preelection pledge to quickly end the fighting that has continued since Russia launched a full-scale invasion in February 2022. In his efforts to secure a peace deal between the two countries, Trump has clashed with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky along the way.
Zelensky has repeatedly resisted pressure from his U.S. counterpart to agree to a deal on terms that Ukraine argues would reward Russia for its invasion. During one notably tense moment at the White House in February 2025, U.S. Vice President JD Vance told Zelensky, “Just say thank you” for the United States’ help.
Among Trump’s swipes at Zelensky, he said that same month that the Ukrainian president had “better move fast or he is not going to have a country left.”
In April 2025, Trump suggested Ukraine had started the war, telling reporters: “You don’t start a war against somebody that’s 20 times your size and then hope that people give you some missiles.”
Prince Harry Says Russian Child Abductions May Be Genocide
Harry said the war was a battle to defend democracy, adding: “It begins with the violation of the Budapest Memorandum-an agreement under which Ukraine relinquished the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal in exchange for binding assurances of its sovereignty and territorial integrity.
“Those assurances were not just broken; they were discarded. And when commitments of that magnitude are violated, the damage does not stop at Ukraine’s borders-it strikes at the credibility of every international guarantee, every non-proliferation effort, and every promise made between nations. But the consequences are not only strategic-they are profoundly human.”
On Russia’s conduct in the war, Harry warned that abductions and resettlement of Ukrainian children could constitute genocide under international law.
“The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for the unlawful deportation and transfer of children-acts that are not incidental to war, but central to a wider strategy,” he said.
“Tens of thousands of Ukrainian children have been forcibly taken from their homes-many separated from parents who were killed, detained, or simply lost in the chaos-and transported into Russia or Russian-controlled territories.
“There, they are subjected to a system designed to erase who they are: given new identities, new citizenship, placed into Russian families, and cut off from their language, culture, and country. Obstacles are deliberately created to prevent their return.
“Under international law, the forcible transfer of children from one national group to another is not just a war crime-it can constitute an act of genocide when carried out with intent to destroy a people’s identity.”
On the question of whether the action was deliberate, Harry added: “This is not collateral damage. This is not the chaos of war spilling over. This is organized, systematic, intentional, and designed to endure long after the fighting stops.”
Tensions Between Trump and Prince Harry and Meghan
Trump has previously taken swipes at Harry and his wife, Meghan. In 2020, the president said he was “not a fan” of the Duchess of Sussex. In 2024, Trump was asked on GB News whether Harry might be kicked out of the U.S. if it transpired that he lied on his visa application about his past use of drugs.
“We’ll have to see if they know something about the drugs, and if he lied they’ll have to take appropriate action,” Trump told Nigel Farage, the leader of the right-wing party Reform U.K.
Farage asked whether that meant “not staying in America,” and Trump, who was running for president at the time, said: “Oh, I don’t know. You’ll have to tell me. You just have to tell me. You would have thought they would have known this a long time ago.”
2026 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
This story was originally published April 23, 2026 at 8:28 AM.