Crime & Courts

Friend of Dylann Roof arrested by the FBI

The Meek brothers – Jacob, Joey and Justin, from left – were very nervous as the FBI was knocking on the door this summer.
The Meek brothers – Jacob, Joey and Justin, from left – were very nervous as the FBI was knocking on the door this summer. The Washington Post

The man who opened his home to Dylann Roof in the weeks before the June killings of nine African-Americans in a Charleston church has been arrested by the FBI.

Agents picked up Joseph “Joey” Meek Jr., 21, of Red Bank, while he was at work Thursday afternoon, his girlfriend, Lindsey Fry, told The State newspaper shortly afterward.

Meek called her on his cellphone as it was happening, Fry said. “He just said, ‘They want to talk to me, but I think I’m going to jail,’” she said.

Meek lives in a trailer in Red Bank with his mother, two brothers and Fry, who is 19.

Meek was informed in an Aug. 6 letter from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Columbia that he was a “potential target” of the federal criminal investigation into the slayings of nine parishioners at the historic “Mother” Emanuel AME Church in Charleston.

The letter stated that Meek was under investigation for possible misprision and allegedly making false statements to law enforcement. Both crimes are felonies.

Misprision, which in federal cases means the concealment of knowledge about a crime from authorities after or as the crime is being committed, carries a maximum sentence of three years in prison if Meek is charged with and convicted of that.

If Meek is charged with and convicted of making false statements, he could be facing up to five years in prison. That number rises to eight years when the false statements concern certain types of crimes, including international or domestic terrorism.

Meek told The State newspaper on Tuesday he does not believe he has committed any crime. He said he called authorities as soon as he saw Roof’s image on television in a video taken from a security camera at Emanuel AME Church in Charleston. Roof had been staying off and on with the Meeks in the weeks before the shootings, playing video games and drinking cheap vodka, Meek said after the shootings.

Meek told The State reporters in late June that on June 10, while he, Roof and their friend Christon Scriven were getting drunk on vodka, Roof announced plans to carry out a mass shooting seven days later at the College of Charleston.

Though they thought the talk was drunken bluster, Scriven and Meek were concerned enough that they went out to Roof’s car and took Roof’s handgun, hiding it until they all sobered up, Meek said. They gave it back to Roof at Fry’s urging, she told reporters in June. She said Meek was on probation and she didn’t want him to get caught carrying a gun.

Roof faces state and federal murder charges in the June 17 shootings. A manifesto Roof allegedly published online said he went there hoping to start a race war.

Authorities said they were worried Roof had something even bigger planned after The State reported on an encounter Roof had with law enforcement just before he bought his handgun.

A Columbia police officer reported March 13 that he found part of an AR-15 assault rifle and six 40-bullet banana-style ammo clips in Roof’s car during a routine encounter in a downtown Columbia park. Roof told the officer he wanted to buy an AR-15, the semiautomatic civilian version of the U.S. military’s M16 fully automatic assault rifle.

It’s unclear what Meek is being charged with. Meek will be arraigned and charged at 10 a.m. Friday at the federal courthouse in Columbia. A federal motion was filed Thursday in the Roof case by U.S. assistant prosecutor Nathan Williams but was sealed immediately by magistrate judge Bristow Marchant. It’s unclear if it related to Meek.

Meek’s mother, Kim Konzny, 41, told The State Thursday evening that she wasn’t surprised her son was arrested, saying that “everybody knew it was coming.” But Konzny said that she is angry and that her son has been unfairly targeted. Konzny said that Meek would not have lied to federal investigators and that her son “deserves different.”

“I’m worried, but then I’m not worried because I know my son didn’t do anything wrong,” Konzny said. “He shouldn’t have gotten arrested.”

Simply making him a better witness?

Meek told The State reporters Tuesday he was concerned about the letter but said, “It doesn’t matter, because I know I didn’t do anything.”

For Meek to be found guilty of misprision, federal prosecutors would have to prove four things: that a felony had been committed, that Meek knew it had been committed, that Meek failed to notify authorities and that he took an “affirmative step” to conceal the crime.

Lying or misleading investigators or hiding evidence could constitute taking an affirmative step to conceal a crime, said Mark Moore, an attorney who spent more than 24 years as an assistant U.S. attorney in Columbia and now works at Nexsen Pruet in Columbia. Moore is not affiliated with the case.

Meek would not be found guilty of making false statements unless prosecutors prove he concealed or covered up a material fact or provided a false statement – either orally or in writing – to investigators.

What will influence Meek’s outcome is his level of cooperation, since he is potentially a key federal prosecution witness, a top South Carolina defense attorney said Thursday.

Because he spent time with Roof in the weeks leading up to the Charleston shootings, Meek would be able to share with a jury not only details of Roof’s actions before the crime, but a description Roof’s state of mind and what he was saying, said attorney Jack Swerling of Columbia, who also is not affiliated with the case.

Swerling has more than 40 years of criminal defense work in both state and federal courts and also lectures frequently on criminal law.

Charging Meek does not necessarily mean that federal authorities are exploring ways to send him to prison, Swerling said. On the contrary, federal prosecutors often will bring a charge against someone who is indirectly involved in a crime in order to make that person a better prosecution witness, Swerling said.

That’s because any key prosecution witness can be expected to undergo a grueling cross-examination by defense attorneys, and if prosecution lawyers have not brought out damaging information first to the jury during the direct examination, it can look like the prosecution was concealing something, Swerling said.

“The government is interested in having a hook in the witness and prosecuting him so he has credibility – it’s not like giving him blanket immunity, which they don’t do very often,” Swerling said.

“It’s better for the government to get that information out first – that the guy did make a false statement, that he did commit misprision of a felony but now he’s cooperating, he’s got a plea bargain and the witness has an expectation of being assisted by the government.”

In the Roof case, Swerling said, prosecutors will want to show “Roof’s state of mind through the statements that he made and the actions that he took,” and Meek “is in an excellent position to relate that to a jury.”

Defense attorneys will want to know if Meek made inconsistent statements to federal agents, and through the process of discovery, they will have access to FBI write-ups of every interview Meek gave the FBI, Swerling said.

“It’s prosecution strategy vs. defense strategy,” Swerling said. “The government has all the reasons in the world to bring it out up front, because Roof’s defense lawyers will be trying to undermine (Meek’s) credibility.”

Peripheral charges in other mass killings

Joey Meek isn’t the first associate of a mass shooting suspect to be targeted by law enforcement in an investigation. The others have had varying degrees of knowledge about, or sometimes deep involvement in, the crime.

Three friends of Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were sentenced in June 2015 to prison for their roles in impeding the FBI’s investigation into the bombings.

Days after the bombings, Dias Kadyrbayev, Azamat Tazhayakov and Robel Phillipos entered Tsarnaev’s dorm room at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth and removed Tsarnaev’s laptop and backpack.

Kadyrbayev later threw away Tsarnaev’s backpack, which contained hollowed-out fireworks and a jar of Vaseline. He was sentenced to six years in prison after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to obstruct justice and obstruction of justice with intent to impede the bombing investigation.

Tazhayakov was sentenced to 3 1/2 years in prison after he was found guilty of the same charges. And Phillipos was sentenced to three years in prison after he was convicted of lying to federal agents about being in Tsarnaev’s room with Kadyrbayev and Tazhayakov.

Two associates of the shooters in the 1999 Columbine High School massacre also received jail time.

Mark Manes, who provided one of the guns Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris used in the shootings, was sentenced almost seven months after the massacre to six years in prison. Manes received a six-year sentence for selling a weapon to a minor and three years in prison for possessing a sawed-off shotgun, though the sentences were set to run concurrently.

Philip Duran was sentenced in 2000 to 4 1/2 years in prison for introducing Klebold and Harris to Manes at a gun show, though he knew they were under-age. He pleaded guilty to providing a handgun to minors. Duran also received a concurrent 2 1/2 year sentence for possessing a dangerous weapon.

Related stories from Charlotte Observer