Don’t let the Titan sub tragedy lead to unneeded, innovation-killing new regulations | Opinion
As a councilman for the city of Gulfport, Mississippi, I’ve witnessed the incredible spirit of exploration and innovation that drives our community and nation forward. Recently, an opinion piece by Kansas City Star Opinion Editor Yvette Walker, which was also published in the Biloxi Sun Herald, called for increased regulation following the tragic incident involving the Titan submersible on its mission to view the wreckage of the Titanic.
From my position in Gulfport, where the “blue economy” of businesses related to ocean faring is a significant driver, I found her perspective on deep sea exploration regulation thought-provoking. While the loss of life in this incident is deeply saddening, I believe it’s essential to consider the broader implications of such regulation.
Exploration, by its very nature, involves risk. This is true whether a quest is for scientific research or tourism. The incident with the Titan submersible, which involved a mix of exploration and tourism, is a stark reminder of this fact. Yet, through these risks, we’ve achieved some of our most significant advancements and experiences.
The exploration of the deep sea is no different. It’s a frontier that holds untold scientific and economic potential. The knowledge we gain from these explorations can lead to advancements in various fields, from climate science to resource management. And for tourists, it offers a unique and thrilling experience that can foster a deeper appreciation for our planet’s wonders.
The loss of the Titan submersible and its five passengers was tragic. Still, it’s also an opportunity for learning and improvement, not a call for outright prohibition. The focus should be on improving safety measures and protocols, not imposing regulations that could stifle exploration and innovation.
Moreover, where do we draw the line with such regulations? If we start regulating deep sea exploration, what’s to stop us from regulating mountain climbing, skydiving or any other activity that involves a degree of risk? I watched Evel Knievel climb into a rocket-powered sled to jump the Grand Canyon on TV as a child. We love the risk-takers, and we shouldn’t take that away.
Instead of imposing more regulations, we should consider creating clear boundaries for using public funds to rescue private adventurers. This approach could potentially influence the risk tolerance of private explorers and tourists, as the lack of a public safety net might make them more cautious.
Furthermore, the insurance aspect could play a significant role in decision-making. A vessel developed by seasoned marine engineers with a track record of successful projects would likely be easier to insure than a one-off, novel craft with no proven success. Insurance coverage could be a deciding factor for potential passengers considering such adventures.
While safety should always be a priority, we mustn’t let fear stifle our spirit of exploration or our desire for unique experiences. Because allowing private interests to continue pushing the envelope is good for all of us.
This story was originally published June 30, 2023 at 6:09 AM with the headline "Don’t let the Titan sub tragedy lead to unneeded, innovation-killing new regulations | Opinion."